Friday, January 14, 2022

"Office-less companies risk alienating Gen Z"/ "Over half of remote workers would consider quitting before returning to office, poll finds"

Apr. 12, 2021 "Office-less companies risk alienating Gen Z": Today I found this article by Linda Nazarth in the Globe and Mail.


Host of the Work and the Future podcast and senior fellow for economics and population change at the Macdonald-Laurier Institute in Ottawa

Ah, that first job after graduation. You get your offer, hopefully in a fun new city, find a place to live and maybe buy some new grown-up clothes to wear. Then you meet your new co-workers, settle in to learn from them and, if all goes well, end your first week with drinks and conversation with your colleagues at a nearby pub. For many workers, it is the system that gets them used to their company’s culture and readies them for the next job up the ladder – or at least that’s how it was in prepandemic times.

Now, with working from home entrenched in corporate culture, young workers are likely propping up their laptops in their bedrooms, logging in and starting their careers from there. Small wonder, then, that many would like to get back to a physical office – so much so that companies trying to find the best talent might do well to think about keeping some desk space available.

It is all part of the very mixed bag of preferences and choices that companies will have to sort out as the pandemic ends and the much-heralded “hybrid” style of work takes hold. Although companies and workers have had different experiences, for the most part the work-from-home experiment has turned out to be something of a success.

According to a study from Statistics Canada, as of February, 2021, 3.1 million Canadians were working from home and most were finding that they liked it just fine. 

Of those who were new to teleworking (that is, had not worked from home prepandemic), 90 per cent said they were at least as productive as before, with 32 per cent saying they accomplished more each hour from home than at the office. 

Judging by the spate of announcements from companies such as Spotify and Twitter that are extending virtual work indefinitely, organizations generally agree that all is good.

There are, however, generational differences in attitudes when it comes to working from home. For an older millennial who is 10 or 15 years into their career, with kids and a house an hour away from the office, losing the commute may be a huge relief, and companies that offer them that arrangement are in hot demand. 

The same goes perhaps for the boomer who is approaching retirement and wants to do their work without having to deal with office politics. 

Younger workers, though, are more likely to want mentoring and the chance to hang out with their peers, so jobs that do not offer that option may seem less attractive.

A study released by Microsoft in March bears out the idea that working from home is more difficult for Generation Z (those born since 1997) than for other generations. After surveying 31,000 workers, the company found that although Gen Z workers were slightly more likely to apply for a job with some remote options, rather than one that was completely office-based, as a group they had many misgivings about working from home. 

Many were more stressed than older peers and said they felt isolated working alone. They often lacked the space or money to create good workspaces for remote work. As a group, they had difficulty feeling engaged or excited about work and found it difficult to get in a word during meetings or bring new ideas to the table.

That younger workers feel more burnt out and disengaged about work than their older colleagues does not bode well for the work force post pandemic. At the very least, it suggests companies need to be pro-active in putting in place policies that allow workers to network continually, even if virtually, and meet in person from time to time. Organizations that cannot figure out how to engage workers risk having a pool of young employees whose productivity is subpar and who perhaps will carry negative attitudes with them as they advance.

The other possibility, of course, is that unhappy and isolated young workers will leave companies that do not offer that in-person interaction. It is an issue in many countries, with Britain’s Chancellor of the Exchequer recently warning companies there that young people will “vote with their feet” and quit those organizations that do not offer them the chance to work alongside more experienced colleagues.

And it’s an issue that will become increasingly important as the economy heats up after the pandemic. Keep in mind, too, that Gen Z is a relatively small cohort (there were 2.5 million Canadians aged 20 to 25 in 2020, compared with 2.7 million aged 30 to 34), which will also make it difficult to attract those most in demand.

In all, balancing generational needs highlights what a pivotal time this is for organizations crafting human-resources plans for the post pandemic future. The pandemic has demonstrated that work can get done in many ways, but it would clearly be foolhardy to think that arrangements cobbled together during a time of crisis can continue without adjustments forever.

It may indeed be a future that is much more difficult to manage, since “hybrid” may mean something different to every worker and may need to change over time. The temptation, of course, will be to pick a one-size-fits-all policy, whether that means heading back to the office, staying virtual or a fixed-ratio version of hybrid work for everyone. Although companies that go this route may find things easier in the short run, in the long run they may find it much more difficult to attract and keep the workers they need.







Young people often live with roommates or other family members. Many young people working from home are confined all day to their bedroom. It's the only space they have to themselves. 

It is easy to understand why they would want to return to work.
Also, many people meet their partner in the workplace. It doesn't always work out, but taking your chances on a workplace romance is preferable to endlessly cycling through potential mates on Tinder.

It's the youngsters who are the future movers and shakers. Young people are generally more sociable than older people.

Middle-aged people who become set in their ways and refuse to come into the office because it's outside their comfort zone risk being left behind and being regarded as old fuddy duddies. 


Why do articles like this one still refer to milennials?  When I read the word “milennial” I’m primed to think of a young person.  But then I remember that the oldest milennials are actually now 40 years old.   That’s not young.   Maybe it’s time to retire the term.  It’d be like using the word “fresh” to describe an apple that’s been in your crisper for three weeks.  Sure, it’s probably not rotten.   It might even still be pretty good.  But it’s not fresh.  
I think there are plenty of people who don't enjoy the after-work socializing.  The corporate climbing and backstabbing that often goes on is tiresome, and woe betide anyone looking for office romance -- it rarely works out well.

I did a certain amount of it, but only what I deemed to be the minimum.  It's important to remember that in most cases your friends at work aren't really your friends.....they are interested in contacts rather than mutual emotional support and carefree good times.

The move to remote work may serve certain people very well -- the kind that prefer to get ahead by doing consistently good work.  I have no doubt that office politics will go virtual as well, but without the coffee klatches and 5 o'clock booze-ups they won't be as important as they used to be.

Might be a good thing.

I spent my late 20s and early 30s regularly and routinely doing the after work booze thing.   Where I worked it was usually Thursday nights.   During the nicer patio months it might be even twice a week that you’d go out.   And yes, the networking helped accelerate my career at the time.  You can refer to that as politicking, and to some degree it was.  

But what do you think I discussed with the more senior people I was having beers with?  We didn’t talk about our pets, or the last good book we read.   We talked about work: ideas to fix problem files; how to restructure certain areas or operations to make them better; improving internal communications.  Work stuff.   So yeah, go figure, if you spend an extra four hours a week talking about work stuff (even if it’s over drinks) with other coworkers then odds are you’ll be further along for the next promotion vs. some colleague who spent that same four hours every week at the gym, or playing ultimate frisbee.  And frankly, it’s only fair that it should be that way.  



Jan. 12, 2022 "Over half of remote workers would consider quitting before returning to office, poll finds": Today I found this article by Matthew Boyle on Bloomberg news:

Workers grew more uncomfortable about heading back to the office in the first week of the year and were much more likely to consider quitting if their employer demanded they return, a sign that companies’ efforts to get people back amid rising COVID caseloads face stiff resistance.

The share of remote workers who would consider leaving their job if they were asked back to the office before they felt safe rose to 55 per cent as of Jan. 6, up from 45 per cent just a week earlier, according to pollster Morning Consult.

More than four in 10 workers felt unsure about returning to the office, compared with 35 per cent who said so on Dec. 30. People were also less likely to want to attend indoor sporting events, go to the movies and dine out, Morning Consult’s weekly survey found.

Omicron Angst

The findings come as Facebook parent Meta Platforms Inc. and other companies once again delay plans to bring employees back to their desks as the omicron variant sweeps through the U.S.

The surge has led to staffing shortages with millions of Americans calling in sick, on top of those who have already quit, sapping the nation’s economic recovery. Employers are also unsure whether the Supreme Court will toss out the Biden administration’s proposed vaccine shot-or-test rule, clouding the workplace situation even more.

“When organizations don’t communicate effectively about what the future looks like, it creates uncertainty and can cause people to quit,” said Jim Harter, chief scientist of workplace and wellbeing at Gallup Inc.

“Matching what employers and workers want going forward is essential, because work will never be the same again.”

Over half of remote workers would consider quitting before returning to office, poll finds - BNN Bloomberg


No comments: