Friday, October 7, 2022

"Banking sleep ahead of time can stave off exhaustion, study shows"/ "Couples bicker better on proper sleep: study"

Feb. 27, 2017 "Banking sleep ahead of time can stave off exhaustion, study shows": Today I found this article by Alex Hutchinson in the Globe and Mail:


A few years ago, researchers at Colorado College tested the effects of “placebo sleep.” Volunteers received fictitious feedback from a sleep-monitoring device about the quality of their previous night’s sleep; those who were told they had slept well scored better on a series of cognitive tests than those told they had slept poorly – regardless of their actual sleep quality.

The results underscore how hard it is disentangle the physiological effects of sleep from our expectations and hang-ups about it. 

For shift workers, ultra-endurance athletes and even jet-setting executives, missing sleep is a confidence-sapping occupational hazard with both mental and physical consequences.

The solution? It turns out you can ward off some of the effects by “banking” extra sleep in advance, according to recent research.

In a study published last August in Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, a team of scientists including University of Calgary kinesiology professor Guillaume Millet tested the effects of six days of extra sleep on physical performance before and after a night of total sleep deprivation.

Millet’s interest in the topic was piqued by his own experiences in an epic race called the Tor des GĂ©ants, which traverses 330 kilometres of mountain trails in northwestern Italy, ascending and descending 24,000 metres of elevation – triple the height of Mount Everest. In 2010, Millet staggered home in third place after more than 87 hours of running, during which he had slept for only three hours.

“I can tell you that at the end of the race, I wasn’t too sure if I was running or if I was dreaming,” he recalls.

In the same race a year later, one of Millet’s friends was in third place 85 hours into the race, running on even less sleep, when he collapsed just short of the finish and was unable to continue – a stark demonstration of the extreme limits of sleep deprivation.

To provide a bulwark against lack of sleep, Millet and his colleagues, including lead author Pierrick Arnal, asked their 12 volunteers to go to bed two hours earlier than normal for six nights. Then, before and after a sleepless night, they performed a knee-extension exercise until they were too exhausted to continue.

After a week of normal sleep, the average time to exhaustion (which was a little less than 15 minutes on average) decreased by 7.2 per cent after sleep deprivation. In contrast, after six days of extended sleep, the post sleep deprivation decrease was just 3.7 per cent – evidence that the banked sleep had indeed helped them cope.

Perhaps unsurprisingly, the week of extra sleep also improved performance in the baseline test before the sleepless night, by 3.9 per cent on average. It’s worth noting that, under normal circumstances, the subjects reported spending about eight hours a night in bed, and sleep monitoring showed they were getting seven hours of sleep a night – roughly in line with the Canadian average, but apparently not enough to maximize their performance.

By going to bed two hours earlier than normal, the subjects got an extra 75 minutes of sleep a night, on average. In one sense, this is disappointing, since it means they “wasted” 45 minutes a night. On the other hand, after some tossing and turning, they did succeed in getting a significant chunk of extra sleep – proof that the body’s rhythms can, with effort, be altered.

That may be partly because the study excluded “evening chronotypes,” better known as night owls. Forcing night owls to go to bed at 9 p.m. would have been “too stressful” for them, the researchers decided.

Would a similar approach work for night owls if they decided to sleep in for two hours each morning rather than going to bed early? It’s possible, but hasn’t been tested (much less approved by your boss). Whatever approach you take, Millet says, should “respect your chronotype.” (It’s probably not a coincidence that morning chronotypes tend to be overrepresented in sports that feature early-morning practices or competitions.)

One final wrinkle: Tests of neuromuscular function, measured by using electrical and magnetic jolts to stimulate the muscles, showed no effects from either sleep extension or deprivation.

 But the perceived effort associated with a given level of exercise was different in each case: Sleep’s biggest effects, in other words, seem to be in the head rather than the muscles.

That could be biological – a consequence of changes in the levels of neurotransmitters such as adenosine, for example. But, as the “placebo sleep” study showed, our expectations also play a role.

“If you haven’t had a good night of sleep before your race,” Millet says, “as soon as something starts to go wrong, you tend to attribute that to sleep deprivation.”

Given that the night before a big race (or an important test or a high-stakes meeting) often tends to involve a lot of tossing and turning, that point is worth remembering. If you’ve banked enough extra sleep in the preceding week, you’ll be able to handle that one bad night with aplomb.

Alex Hutchinson’s latest book is Which Comes First, Cardio or Weights? Follow him on Twitter @sweatscience

Comments:

Andrew from Toronto
2 days ago

This could be useful information for other all-night events. I have at least taken naps the day before the all-night art show Nuit Blanche.


willough1
3 days ago

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
2 Reactions


LaBelleOtero
1 day ago

Since our entire culture is sleep-deprived, albeit functional, what these researchers actually did is prove that people who *don't* have a sleep debt function better under duress than people who do. They haven't actually proven you can bank sleep, and if they were full-time researchers in sleep, rather than just dabbling in the area, they'd know that.
See 'Sleep Thieves' by Stanley Coren for more information.





Sept. 7, 2017 "Couples bicker better on proper sleep: study": Today I found this article by Tara Parker Pope in the Globe and Mail:


It started as a simple conversation about a child’s birthday party. But it quickly escalated into a full-blown marital rift. She accused him of neglecting the family. He said she was yelling.
“Whatever,” she said. “Go. Go.”
“Go where?” he replied.
“I don’t know,” she told him. “I don’t want to talk to you anymore.”
The bickering parents were among 43 couples taking part in an Ohio State University study exploring how marital interactions influence a person’s health. Every couple in the study — just like couples in the real world — had experienced some form of routine marital conflict. Hot-button topics included managing money, spending time together as a family or an in-law intruding on the relationship.

But while marital spats were universal among the couples, how they handled them was not.

Some couples argued constructively and even with kindness, while others — like the couple fighting about the birthday party — were hostile and negative.

What made the difference? The hostile couples were most likely to be those who weren’t getting much sleep.

“When people have slept less, it’s a little like looking at the world through dark glasses,” said Janice Kiecolt-Glaser, a longtime relationship scientist and director of the Ohio State Institute for Behavioral Medicine Research. “Their moods are poorer. We’re grumpier. Lack of sleep hurts the relationship.”

The men and women in the study had been married from three to 27 years. They reported varying amounts of sleep — anywhere from three and a half to nine hours a night. Each couple made two visits to the lab, where the partners were prodded to talk about the issues that caused the most conflict in their relationship. 

Then the researchers analyzed videos of their exchanges using well-established scoring techniques to assess positive and negative interactions and hostile and constructive responses. After all the data were parsed, a clear pattern emerged.

Couples were more likely to be hostile — like the couple fighting about the child’s birthday party — when both partners were functioning on less than seven hours of sleep.

Notably, the couples with more than seven hours of sleep still argued with each other, but the tone of their conflict was different. Consider this couple discussing concerns about spending and budget challenges.
“Do you want to try taking over the budget?”
“I can’t. I don’t want to.”
“I understand.”
“You’re just being too accepting. You can tell me I’m crazy.”
“You’re not crazy.”

Although the couple had indicated they regularly argued about money issues, getting adequate sleep seemed to give them the patience to approach conflict in a constructive way.

“It’s not the fact that the couples were disagreeing,” Dr. Kiecolt-Glaser said. “It’s the lack of sleep and the way in which they disagreed.”

She continued: “The better functioning couples could do it with humor and kindness but clearly still disagree. The poorer functioning couples could get pretty nasty.”

The notion that better sleep makes a better marriage isn’t entirely new. A large body of research suggests that sleep-deprived people are more unpleasant and even hostile in their social interactions than those who get adequate sleep. People tend to use more negative words when they are sleep deprived than on days when they have had a full night’s sleep. 

A 2010 study found that men were more likely to fight with their wives after a night of disturbed sleep. In a 2014 study, couples who reported poor sleep during a two-week period reported more daily marital conflict than those who got better sleep.

But the Ohio State study went a step further to measure how marital discord combined with sleep deprivation can become toxic to a person’s health. Each partner in the study also gave blood samples, before and after the fight with their spouse. The samples were to measure markers of inflammation, which has been linked with heart disease, cancer and other health problems.

The study found that when married partners got less sleep, not only were they more likely to have hostile conflicts, but they also had higher levels of inflammatory proteins in their blood after those conflicts. In short, marital discord is more toxic to your body when you haven’t gotten enough sleep.

“Lack of sleep not only hurts the relationship,” said Dr. Kiecolt-Glaser, the senior author on the study, which was published in May in the journal Psychoneuroendocrinology. “It makes relationship conflict harder on the body.”

There was some good news from the study. When one partner got more rest, it was possible to mitigate the impact of sleep deprivation on the other partner. Couples with one rested partner were less likely to engage in hostile exchanges than when both partners were sleep deprived.

“Sleep and conflict worked together to increase inflammation, but both partners’ sleep mattered,” said Stephanie Wilson, the study’s lead author and a postdoctoral fellow at Ohio State. “When one person was rested, it protected the couple from being more nasty to each other.”

Sleep problems in a relationship aren’t uncommon. The National Sleep Foundation found that nearly 25 percent of couples sleep in separate beds. 

Other research shows that having a bed partner affects how much and how well a person sleeps. And when one relationship partner doesn’t sleep well, his or her partner is more likely to report poor health and well-being.

While the recent study examined only heterosexual married couples, the findings likely are relevant to all couples, including cohabiting couples and gay and lesbian partners. “These are universal relationship processes,” said Dr. Wilson. “Just knowing these effects can happen can help people keep in mind the importance of getting a good night’s sleep and treading carefully with conflict.”

The lesson, say the study authors, is that before concluding a relationship is in trouble, couples who regularly experience conflict should take stock not only of the relationship and how they are managing conflict, but also of their sleep habits.

“Losing sleep here and there and coming across interpersonal tensions in daily life is really common for people,” Dr. Wilson said. 

“These are small vulnerabilities that may add up. It teaches you the importance of getting rested every night and handling disagreements in a mindful way.”



No comments: