Friday, September 4, 2020

"Why 'Lean In'? It's time for Men to 'Lean Out'"/ "Where are all the female clean-tech entrepreneurs?"


Oct. 13, 2019 "Why 'Lean In'?  It's time for Men to 'Lean Out'": Today I found this article by Ruth Whippman in the New York Times because a customer G gave me the section.  You have to pay to read it: 
In the workplace, probably unsurprisingly to many women who are routinely talked over, patronized or ignored by male colleagues, research shows that rather than women being underconfident, men tend to be overconfident in relation to their actual abilities. Women generally aren’t failing to speak up; the problem is that men are refusing to pipe down.The New York Times
Author Ruth Whippman, writing in The New York Times, questions the focus on coaching women to adopt the aggressive social behaviors of men in the workplace. 

Might these efforts be more effective if men were simultaneously encouraged to cede space, attention, and power in a reciprocal manner? 
"The assumption that assertiveness is a more valuable trait than say, deference is itself the product of a ubiquitous and corrosive gender hierarchy," Whippman writes. This bias, according to Whippman, includes career and educational focuses, including the fact that "tax dollars are poured into encouraging girls to take up STEM subjects, but no one seems to care much whether boys become nurses." 
With progress toward pay equity in the architecture field more or less stalled, and executive-level imbalances continuing for the foreseeable future, should more men adopt a "lean out" approach?
  • 6 Comments

  • archinet
    Well they could learn how to be less condescending for sure. For instance I was just at a big international architectural exhibition- not in the US,  and bumped into an old professor of mine who was talking to me in his usually condescending way when a head of an institute at the arch school I work for came round. I introduced her and she could barely stand him and the way he was talking to both of us, once he realized who she was he completely changed his manners. She barely talked to him for more then 5 minutes bc she could not stand him- as she told me herself after the fact.   
    Oct 11, 19 7:37 am
    Chemex
    “Ms Whippman is writing a book about raising children”
    Of course.
    How about writing a book telling people to do whatever the hell works for them? 
    Oct 11, 19 9:08 am
    Chemex
    More confirmation that the goal of the PC politic isn’t diversify or inclusion but getting rid of white men
    tduds
    Good riddance.
    SneakyPete
    Chemex, you sure you don't need a grievance department?
    Chemex
    and around and around we go
    b3tadine[sutures]
    White men, are doing a good job of architecting their own irrelevance.
    Happy Anarchy
    Dear Chemex, men don't express their grievances.
    Oct 11, 19 10:56 pm
    b3tadine[sutures]
    no, they murder women, trans-women, and shoot up schools, churches, malls, synagogues...............
    Happy Anarchy
    yup. hug it out bruh. hug it out.
    Happy Anarchy
    .
    Image result for hugging a fluffy unicorn

    The assumption that assertiveness is a more valuable trait than, say, deference is itself the product of a ubiquitous and corrosive gender hierarchy.
    So perhaps instead of nagging women to scramble to meet the male standard, we should instead be training men and boys to aspire to women’s cultural norms, and selling those norms to men as both default and desirable. To be more deferential. To reflect and listen and apologize where an apology is due (and if unsure, to err on the side of a superfluous sorry than an absent one). To aim for modesty and humility and cooperation rather than blowhard arrogance.
    This article is sloppy. The author fails to make a vital distinction between genuine assertiveness and aggression/arrogance. Genderizing assertiveness is not only spurious but also dangerous. In a competitive and largely indifferent world, from school to work, none of us will get far unless we learn to look out for ourselves and take initiatives that won't fall in our lap. 
    I taught college, and my primary goal was to encourage students to look at themselves and learn to speak up. There was no penalty for trying, or for trying and failing. Doing so helps them define themselves and will strengthen them in the years to come. They did, including and especially women, who were better students. (I sometimes felt sorry for the boys.) No amount of politeness and leaning will change the fact they have to show up to class and make the grade.
    It's not hard to imagine, in our hypersensitive world, any assertive behavior being labeled as aggressive—and male—and I've seen it. This can lead to another kind of tyranny, the silence of conformity, complacency, and judgment.
    We all would benefit from civility, and both genders are capable of it.
    Or:
    If men are aggressive, insensitive bastards, you'd better not count on them changing.
    Oct 12, 19 5:21 pm
    tintt
    That's a sloppy reading of the article.
    tintt
    Capitulation poses - yes!
    Oct 13, 19 8:00 am

    Thayer-D
    Men should definitely be leaning out more and we as a society should be encouraging it.   I'm all for leaning in, but if you don't shut up sometimes, you'll knock heads when there's no reason to, and now more than ever we need to figure out how to work together.  Go bonobos!   
https://archinect.com/news/article/150164020/should-men-learn-to-lean-out





Jun. 21, 2018 "Where are all the female clean-tech entrepreneurs?": Today I found this article by Humera Maik in the Globe and Mail:


Humera Malik is founder and CEO of Toronto-based industrial AI company Canvass Analytics. She is also on the jury of the Women In Cleantech Challenge, which is accepting applications until July 13 at www.womenincleantech.ca.

It is often said, but bears repeating, that women are significantly underrepresented in the innovation economy, with one recent report finding that only 5 per cent of Canadian technology companies have a solo female founder or chief executive. 

Such representation is similar – and arguably worse – when the focus is on the clean-technology sector. Where women do have a presence, they typically occupy junior roles in marketing, communications or finance, not senior roles in engineering or in the C-Suite. 

The federal government recently recognized that this gender gap, particularly in areas of innovation, is inhibiting economic growth by leaving skilled talent on the table. It’s also limiting diversity of perspective, which research shows is essential to building economic resilience. 

The 2018 budget highlighted the need to boost the percentage of female-owned companies in the technology sector by providing more women the opportunities they need to succeed, while also removing barriers holding some back. At the same time, the last two federal budgets identified the growth of Canada’s cleantech sector as a national priority. 

It stands to reason that getting more female innovators to build and run companies that are tackling some of the world’s biggest environmental and climate challenges presents a great opportunity for the country. 

The barriers that female tech entrepreneurs face are persistent. One of the biggest is the difficulty raising venture capital – often referred to as the “gender investment gap.” In a recent survey of 350 startups, The Boston Consulting Group reported that female entrepreneurs raised an average of just under US$1-million in early-stage capital, less than half the money that men raised.

“The disparity in the funding is not due to qualitative differences in pitches or underlying businesses,” according to the report authors.

In fact, the results of the survey showed that startups run by women performed much better, returning 78 cents per dollar of investment during their early years of operation compared with just 31 cents for those run by men.

One way to help close the gap, the report concluded, is to provide the mentorship, resources and networking opportunities that women have historically lacked or which have traditionally been biased towards men. 

And this is starting to happen. Organizations such as #movethedial, for example, have done a tremendous job of raising awareness of the gap while building an inclusive support network for women in technology, including cleantech.

The federal government, for its part, is following through on its budget promises. Last month, it announced the $1-million Women In Cleantech Challenge, a collaboration with Toronto’s MaRS Discovery District and the first of five prize-based challenges focused on “unlocking breakthrough solutions to complex and persistent problems in developing clean technology.” 

The goal of the challenge is to recruit Canada’s top female innovators working on cleantech solutions, select an elite cohort of five, and over nearly three years provide them with the mentorship, critical services and curated introductions they need to grow and thrive.

They will each receive a $115,000 annual stipend to cover living expenses and travel, and they’ll be put through an intensive program designed to draw out their entrepreneurial talents, including working closely with business and technical advisers and being matched with a federal research facility that can help accelerate R&D. 

In return, these women will be asked to fully immerse themselves in their mission of building Canada’s next cleantech success stories.

We’re convinced there are hundreds of innovative women across the country who are ideal candidates for this kind of challenge – researchers who are working away in academic or corporate labs, or engineers working in various fields who have amazing ideas but are reluctant to pursue them commercially.

Maybe it’s because they don’t know where to start, or because they know the odds are stacked against them. If investors are less likely to put their money behind women-led ventures and if few mentors exist to guide these innovators along their difficult journey, then it’s understandable why some women never take the entrepreneurial plunge.

The Boston Consulting report recommends that venture capital firms become more aware of the structural biases in their investment decisions, and including more women in those decisions will certainly help.

It also recommends that innovation organizations that support startups, such as accelerators, do a better job of recruiting women entrepreneurs, and of creating mentor, investor and peer networks that are more gender-balanced.

“Accelerators are uniquely positioned to create positive change,” according to the report. “They can bring together a community of startups, women-friendly investors, and other resources – both in person and online – to build a case for change.”
Initiatives like the Women In Cleantech Challenge are a good start.



Audrey Mascarenhas, the CEO of Questor Technology, a publicly traded company in Canada, stands out as a pioneer and the leading light in cleantech. She is also highly regarded in the "Bay Street" community.

No comments: