Sunday, September 30, 2018

"Five tell-tale signs leadership is slipping"/ Debra Kelsall

Mar. 19, 2018 "Five tell-tale signs leadership is slipping": Today I found this article by Merge Gupta-Sunderji in the Globe and Mail:

Merge Gupta-Sunderji, leadership speaker and consultant, is the founder of Turning Managers Into Leaders.


Exceptional leaders understand that there is a difference between management and leadership.


They have learned that organizational success is accomplished not just by getting things done (management), but by getting remarkable things done through a large number of people (leadership).



And not just by any people, but employees who are inspired, motivated and self-driven.


Nevertheless, despite this essential wisdom, almost all leaders also go through rough patches, stressful periods when it's easier to focus on management rather than leadership – when it's simpler, and often crucial, to concentrate on tasks rather than invest in the building and nurturing of high-performing employees.



When this happens, the predicament is that the situation usually spirals downward. 

Employees get frustrated and make errors, patience dwindles and tempers fray. Team members become less engaged, and the leader feels trapped and exasperated. The pattern continues as the state of affairs worsens.


The only way out of this deteriorating dilemma is for a leader to recognize the signs and act decisively to break the cycle. So, what are the clues a leader should watch for? Here are five.


You think an employee "should already know that"


If you find yourself consistently thinking that an employee "should already know that," then perhaps your employees aren't the problem. Have you given them the information they need in order to be productive?

 In times of organizational crisis, consistent communication doesn't always happen. So don't assume your employees know everything you do. Instead, honestly question why your employee "doesn't know" and take ownership and responsibility for the deficiency.


You assume your employees will raise issues or problems without being asked 

When priorities are shifting rapidly, your hope is that your employees will highlight problems on the horizon. If there is a risk of negative repercussions, they will often omit or filter the information they give you. Good leaders know to ask direct questions to uncover problems and issues.


You believe it's easier to do it yourself


If you increasingly find yourself taking on more tasks because, let's face it, the only way to get things done right is to do it yourself, then you have a problem! Your reluctance to delegate responsibilities to your team members is a clear signal that you're slipping back into management mode. If you can't trust your people to do the job well, then you obviously haven't put the right staff in place.


You focus more on what's not working than celebrating what is working

Sure, when you're in crisis management mode, dealing with challenges takes priority. But, be mindful that you don't get sucked into the negativity vortex. For every problem that surfaces, remember your staff are investing energy in solving it, or at least expending significant effort to mitigate the damage. In the heat of the moment, it's easy to forget to acknowledge and appreciate their hard work.


You start telling people what to do rather than asking them what they think

It's tempting to tell your people what to do, particularly when the ship is straying off course. But good leaders know that employees who are able to share their insights and offer their own solutions are much more invested and engaged in both the process and outcomes. So, fight the urge to bark orders and issue commands; that's what managers do. Instead, be a leader: Remind yourself that you put good people in place, so let them do what they do best.



The Ladder: Debra Kelsall: 

Debra Kelsall, 25, of Horsehoe Valley, Ont., an associate in the Investment Banking Division at Goldman Sachs in London, works in debt capital markets and corporate risk management. She completed a Bachelor of Commerce with honours in Investment Management at McGill University before moving to New York.


I am thankful for the opportunities to work in international offices. When I first started working at Goldman in New York, I probably wouldn't have believed it if you told me that two years later I would be moving to London.


The key characteristics that define Goldman Sachs culture – excellence, integrity, teamwork and collaboration, to name a few – undoubtedly carry across the pond. However, the unique cultures of each city visibly impact the respective office cultures. In London, coffee catch-ups are replaced with tea time, small talk begins with weather before sports and while people on both sides are passionate about football, they're talking about a different sport!



Moving away from Canada has certainly made me more aware of things that are distinctly Canadian – and not only the way we say "about" (which to me still doesn't sound that much different). Whenever I go back to Canada, I am always amazed at how genuinely kind people are. 

It's almost like you've stepped into this other world where people look you in the eye and say hello on the street. I try to take a lot of that with me to various places I've lived.


For me, passion and purpose are very much linked. It's more about the "who" than the "what." What I mean by that is that I think people say that you will only be happy when you're pursuing your passion, but that puts a lot of pressure to figure out what exactly that passion is.



One thing that I've always made a priority when moving to a new city is getting connected with a church. It is the place where I have found many of my friends and community and has been a way to meet people who do something different from me. Cycling has also been a helpful bridge in transitioning to a new place – cyclists have a culture of going for group rides together, which are a wonderful way to be introduced to a city and its people.


As a millennial, I believe there is a perception that we can't stick to anything for more than a year, which in some cases is well-founded. However, I think if managers manage their junior people with the mindset that they will probably leave in a year or two, then they're much less inclined to invest in and train that person. If managers took more of a long-term view, they could better help their junior employees adopt a long-term mindset.


Often, we have vague ideas of where we want to be, but to have your manager sit down with you and strategize for where you want to be in the medium term, long term and how to get there … is rare. If your manager is as invested in that end goal as you are, then we would see a lot less people jumping ship after a year or two.


I used to have a perception that leaders must have everything together. In reality – and a lot of this learning came from a course at McGill – I've learned that to be an authentic and inspiring leader, vulnerability plays a huge role. Only when you're willing to be vulnerable with others can you learn from mistakes and become relatable to the people that you're leading.


The best thing you can learn and develop in university is character. Learning to be faithful in the trivial things, to be a team player, to be diligent and to have uncompromised integrity has proven to be one of the most important determinants in my career progression thus far.

https://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/careers/management/debra-kelsall-passion-and-purpose-are-very-much-linked/article38297906/

"A jr. co-worker in the same role is earning more than me"/ "My employer pays us late"

Mar. 12, 2018 "A junior co-worker in the same role is earning more than me": Today I found this article in the Globe and Mail:

THE QUESTION


I have been with a company for seven years, but an employee who has been there less than two years is making more money than I am. We both are classified under the same job. 

There are plenty of things that I know how to do within the company that the other individual does not, and, because I know how, I am expected to do them when others are not. This does not seem right to me, and I'm wondering if this is legal or is there anything that I can do about it?


THE FIRST ANSWER



Colleen Clarke

Workplace coach, corporate trainer, Toronto



There is no legal ramification to this conundrum. It is not uncommon for long-term employees to receive less remuneration than new hires who are in the same job classification.


The starting salary for your job when you joined the company may have increased over the years, more than likely at a faster rate than your salary. Job descriptions may have changed since you were hired, and the individual who was hired only two years ago may possess different skills than you, ones you may not be required or qualified to perform, and vice versa.


So what do you do? Approach your boss in a non-emotional, pragmatic manner. Explain what you know to be true about the pay variance and ask what you can do to rise to the new hire's level of pay. Do not blame or appear jealous.


Whether something can be done or not, strive to excel at what you know that others don't, add new skills to your toolkit and build bridges and network significantly with employees outside of your department and the company.


Make sure that the powers that be know about your professional attributes, positive attitude and self leadership skills. You can always ask for added benefits if a pay increase is not possible. Whatever the outcome, take the high road!

THE SECOND ANSWER


Zuleika Sgro

VP Retail & People, Saje Natural Wellness, Vancouver


My advice in any conversation about compensation is to reach out to your human resources department or your manager to ask about pay ranges, merit increases, performance reviews and, if you are in a union, the agreement around compensation. 

Once you have that information, it's important to ask yourself if you feel you are being discriminated against on protected grounds. If not, it's important you speak to your manager or HR about your experience specifically.


Generally, employees in the same classification are paid within an equitable range, but pay may not be exactly the same and past experience at another company may be taken into account. The employee you are peers with may, in fact, have more experience based on past employment.


I always encourage compensation conversations with those in authority at your job (HR or your manager) rather than other people. You can gain information about yourself and also ask questions about how you could earn more. (It could be via merit, performance, professional development or something else). 

Focus the conversation on how this impacts you and your growth to make it as productive as possible and help you get the information and tools you want. All the best.

https://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/careers/career-advice/a-more-junior-co-worker-in-the-same-role-is-earning-more-than-me-what-can-i-do/article38191317/

Mar. 19, 2018 "My employer consistently pays us late.  Is this legal?": Today I found this article in the Globe and Mail:




THE QUESTION

On three separate occasions, my employer has been waiting on funds to be deposited in order to pay staff. When the company doesn't get paid, the employer states he does not have to pay us until five days after the day our pay is supposed to be distributed. I live in Nova Scotia and haven't been able to get a clear answer from the labour board. This has caused many of my co-workers to be charged a NSF fee. Is this legal?

THE FIRST ANSWER

Daniel Lublin
Partner, Whitten & Lublin Employment Lawyers, Toronto

The Nova Scotia Labour Standards Code provides your employer with the latitude to pay your salary up to five working days later than your regularly scheduled pay day. But habitually abusing this leeway is a form of bad faith, even if not technically illegal.

The late payment rule is not unique to Nova Scotia. Each province addresses this situation slightly differently. For example, in British Columbia and Alberta, employers can pay up to eight and 10 days later than the regularly recurring pay date. In Ontario, however, employers must pay you no later than your regular pay date.

Notwithstanding any of these rules, if your employer is repeatedly paying you late, or sometimes not at all, you are not working for the right company. In some cases, late payment of salary can also amount to a constructive dismissal.

THE SECOND ANSWER
Heather Faire
Canadian human-resources executive, Atlanta

I am going to guess that you work for a small business or startup, which can experience payroll-funding issues. Most provinces allow for reasonably delayed wage payments, to provide flexibility for continued operations.

In the short term, you should explore ways to avoid NSF or late fees. Consider delaying or staggering bill payments and save for an "emergency fund" to cover pay gaps. You should ask your employer if they will reimburse your NSF fees to recover those losses.

In the long term, you should decide whether this is the employer for you.

Startups and small businesses can be exciting. The pace and decision making tend to be fast and there tends to be more openness to new ideas and experimentation. 

Employees can get more responsibility and gain unique experiences. There is a rare chance of an equity-payout jackpot. However, startups and small businesses tend to be risky and stressful. Employees can experience longer hours, lower wages or higher layoff rates.

Large or established businesses can provide more comfort and stability. They tend to be less stressful. Larger or established businesses tend to be less apt to let employees "play out of position" so development can be slower and more standard. 

Generally, the pace and decision making are slower and there is more resistance to experimentation and change.

Where you work can be as important as what or how you are paid. Different work environments have their own risks and rewards. Choose the environment that is best for you overall to ensure your best opportunity for success and happiness.




 https://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/careers/career-advice/my-employer-consistently-pays-us-late-is-this-legal/article38296809/