Saturday, September 19, 2026

"How some of your favourite brands are brought back from the dead"/ "Home goods store Flying Tiger lands in Canada, where competition awaits"

Apr. 8, 2024 "How some of your favourite brands are brought back from the dead": Today I found this article by Brandie Weikle on CBC:


One brand of clothing — specifically pants — has always had a special place in the closet of Alex Curry of Sexsmith, Alta., a small town about 20 kilometres north of Grand Prairie. 

"From high school, I loved Modrobes. I think from about Grade 7, I really noticed they were unique."

The loose-fitting, made-in-Canada pants came in a range of bright colours and were the height of rave and streetwear fashion in the late 1990s. 

However, after that initial craze passed, 

the brand sought bankruptcy protection in 2003. 

It attempted a return in 2010, but the second life didn't last long.

That is, until 2022. After a chance search on eBay to see if he could buy a pair of the pants, 

Alex discovered the brand had been put up for sale. 

He and his wife, Zoë, ended up buying the company, 

and are now operating it out of their home as an online store.

Modrobes isn't the only once-dead brand that's recently been resurrected: 

stores like

Le Château, 

Pier 1 

and HMV have all been reworked in some form, 

as companies try to capitalize on customers' nostalgia. 

Bringing back beloved brands — whether 

online, 

as a pop-up 

or as full bricks and mortar 

— can be good business. 

That's because the factors that lead to a company's demise can sometimes have little to do with whether consumers are still interested in its products, 

says retail advisor Farla Efros.

"It's kind of what happens behind the scenes," 

said Efros, formerly CEO of True Religion Brand Jeans, 

itself a brand that came back from bankruptcy twice.

It could be that poor management 

or cash flow are to blame, 

or an outside circumstance, like the COVID-19 pandemic. 

"But at the end of the day, it's not the brand's fault."

And even though some consumers have complained that a brand's return isn't the same as before 

— products can be of worse quality, 

at a different price point 

or have less selection 

— companies are hoping the brand equity makes up for it. 


A hidden value

Some of these brands have a lot of heritage, said Efros, who is now president of HRC Retail Advisory, part of professional services firm Accenture. 

When they return, "it's kind of like bringing the band back together again.

"And they come back because they have a ton of awareness

and they mean something to people."

Customers' fondness for a particular brand is tough to build from scratch, 

said Grant Packard, associate professor of marketing at York University's Schulich School of Business in Toronto.

Legacy brands have a hidden value, even after they've gone under, he said. 

"If we can use them successfully, 

that's great, because it's really expensive to build that. 

"So if Toys R Us can come back under 

a new owner 

or in a new market 

and take advantage of that pre-built goodwill 

— that equity 

— then the company is saving millions."

Simply going by some of the dead or dying brands that have recently been revived in Canada,

the appetite for retailers popular in the '90s and 2000s seems to be growing:

  • HMV Canada (Revived February 2024)
  • Zellers (March 2023)
  • Modrobes (October 2022)
  • Le Château (April 2022)

A new business model

The trend has also been a boon to companies whose main purpose is to revive old brands.

Among the largest of them is 

Authentic Brands Group (ABG), a New York-based brand management company. 

It's acquired the rights to nearly 60 brands, 

including Brooks Brothers, 

Nine West 

and Forever 21. 

Founded in 2010 by Canadian billionaire Jamie Salter, 

ABG has become "the poster child for this kind of business model," said Alexandre Terseleer, of management consulting firm Kearney in New York.

ABG buys the rights to brands that are either bankrupt or struggling, 

and can be "bought for almost no money," 

he said. 

It then sets up licensing deals to bring those back in one form or another.

"So the logic behind this is that, first of all, 

you don't need to own all the operations of a brand 

to make it run properly." 

While partner companies make the jeans, sneakers or dress shirts, 

ABG focuses on making the brand more appealing. 

It aims to increase distribution, 

and outsources much of the rest, 

aid Terseleer.

It's been good business for the company — ABG was reportedly valued at $20 billion US in its last funding round, 

and CEO Salter said at a January conference that it's making nearly $30 billion US in global retail sales. 

It's also considering going public within the next year and a half.

ABG didn't respond to a request for an interview from CBC News.


'A whole lot of hype for nothing'

But customers don't always resonate with an old brand's comeback. 

Such was the case for Chantal Saville, 

a gen-Xer who grew up in Toronto with fond memories of going to Zellers, the Canadian discount chain, 

for everything from a new snowsuit to kitchen supplies.

So when, a decade after it shuttered most of its locations, 

it launched pop-up shops in several The Bay stores last year, 

she was eager to check them out.

But to her dismay, "it felt like bougie instead of BiWay," she said, referring to the discount chain that closed in 2001. 

The pop-up featured a smattering of overpriced pet accessories and kitchenware, she said.

"And there was some, you know, nostalgia clothing with some of the logos and stuff on it, which I'm not going to wear."

She and her mom left without buying anything.

"It just seemed like a whole lot of hype for nothing."


Sustainable growth for Modrobes

For Alex and Zoë Curry of the new Modrobes, their priorities include 

keeping overhead down 

so they can grow sustainably, 

and meeting the expectations of original Modrobes fans. 

That's why they trained carefully with the original owner, Stevan Sal Debus, on how to make the iconic pants the exact same way. 

"It's the same CAD [computer-aided design] drawings. 

We are working off of the same raw materials. 

We're sourced through the same original suppliers in Canada," 

said Alex. 

The pants have a different manufacturer, but are still made in Canada.

"We hear from numerous people with these stories of how they're still wearing their pants, and they're so excited that they get new pairs," said Zoë. 

"It's been very overwhelming just how excited people are."

https://www.cbc.ca/radio/costofliving/resurrected-brands-1.7163845


Jun. 26, 2026 "Home goods store Flying Tiger lands in Canada, where competition awaits": Today I found this article by Tara Deschamps on CBC:


A Scandinavian home goods-brand is moving into Canada, 

and retail experts say competitors will have reason to worry if it picks up enough momentum.

Flying Tiger Copenhagen is a Danish retailer that has expanded into 

44 global markets 

over the last 31 years 

by selling low-priced items such as 

dish towels with fruit motifs,

animal-shaped erasers 

and jewellry boxes resembling fancy sofas.

Canada will become its 45th market when the brand opens its first store here Friday at Toronto's Eaton Centre. 

At least four more Canadian locations are expected to follow this year, 

and the retailer plans to continue expanding from there.

"Quality over quantity, but we have great plans for Canada," said Jens Aarup Mikkelsen, Flying Tiger's chief executive.

"We really believe it's going to be one of the leading markets in the Americas."

The chain's arrival is expected to shake up a segment of the retail market long dominated by Dollarama but has increasingly challenged by Asian entrants 

Miniso, 

Daiso 

and Muji, 

as well as established retailers such as 

Giant Tiger 

and Walmart.

"Arguably, there are limits to what the consumer will spend on 

what could be termed fun frivolities, 

so the ongoing expansion of chains that focus on this will eventually produce a crunch," 

Neil Saunders, managing director of retail at research firm Global Data, said in an email.

What will set Flying Tiger apart is not its prices 

— 80 per cent of its 1,800 products will cost less than $10 

— but its eye-catching merchandise 

and ability to keep up with trends,

 said Lisa Hutcheson, a retail strategist with J.C. Williams Group.

"It's a bit more 

elevated, 

curated. 

It doesn't come off quite as cheap," 

she said of Flying Tiger's merchandise. 

"Some of the products are more 

artistic 

and to spend $5 or $7 on something, 

might be that answer to feel good, 

to scratch that itch."

Flying Tiger is known for its use of 

colour 

and patterns 

and often takes cues from viral merchandise. 

Lately, that has meant selling 

bullet journals, 

hand fans 

and miniature washing machines for makeup sponges.

Every product the company sells is 

designed in-house, 

and new merchandise arrives constantly. 

About 300 new items are introduced each month, 

and many are not rereleased once they sell out 

because the brand has already moved onto the next crop of "it" things.

By comparison, Flying Tiger is "more aspirational than a chain like Dollarama," Saunders said.

While there is some overlap with Muji, which entered Canada in 2014 

and now has eight stores, 

Saunders said the two brands have distinct styles.

"Flying Tiger tends to be quite maximalist with a focus on fun and colourful products, 

whereas Muji is minimalist and more sombre," 

he said.

Miniso and Daiso have even more overlap with Flying Tiger 

and therefore pose more direct competition, 

Saunders and Hutcheson agreed.

Miniso, a Chinese retailer that sells 

tchotchkes, 

beauty products 

and plush toys, 

has opened more than 100 stores since entering Canada in 2017.

Daiso, which has founded in Japan, 

has just four Canadian stores, all in B.C., 

but a global footprint of more than 5,000 locations.

"Miniso might be a bit of a competitor. 

As they continue to open stores, will people understand the difference?" 

Hutcheson said. 

"I think that's maybe something that's a bit of a risk."

Daiso and Miniso did not respond to requests for comment. Dollarama declined to comment.

Mikkelsen is not worried about the established competitors. In fact, he welcomes the contest.

"We like a good competition and we're ready to take on what Canada brings," he said.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/business/flying-tiger-canada-expansion-9.7250646


My opinion: I have never seen or heard of "miniature washing machines for makeup sponges."

I don't wear makeup.

I didn't know that Miniso have over 100 stores in Canada.

I have never heard of Daiso or Muji before.  

It's because they're not that big in Canada.  

I then looked up Muji:


AI Overview
There are 8 MUJI stores operating in Canada. [1]
Store Locations by Province
  • British Columbia (4 locations):
    • MUJI Robson Street (Vancouver)
    • MUJI Metrotown (Burnaby)
    • MUJI Richmond Centre (Richmond)
    • MUJI Tsawwassen Mills (Delta) [1]
  • Ontario (4 locations):
    • MUJI Atrium (Toronto - Flagship)
    • MUJI Yorkdale (North York)
    • MUJI Markville (Markham)
    • MUJI at The Well (Toronto) [1]
If you are planning a visit or looking to order

"Possible new Roots owner threads plan for global growth"/ "New Lululemon CEO faces multifront battle to refashion company’s edge"

Aug. 21, 2026 "Possible new Roots owner threads plan for global growth": Today I found this article on BNN Bloomberg:


TORONTO — The New York private equity firm that has signed an agreement to buy Roots Corp. wants to take the storied Canadian brand and export it to the rest of the world.

If the proposed deal goes through, Marquee Brands, the firm behind 

Martha Stewart, 

Laura Ashley 

and Roberto Cavalli, 

says growth will be a top priority.

Chief executive Heath Golden said Friday that he envisions his company bringing Roots to big markets like Korea, India and Mexico and expanding the small presence it already has in the U.S. and China.

“Many of our partners around the world want to be a part of bringing Roots into different markets,” 

he said in an interview. 

“So we think the sky is the limit for this brand.”

Roots has more than 100 corporate-owned stores in Canada 

but just two in the U.S., 

where it’s been working to expand. 

A partner operates another 100 shops in Asia 

and the brand also has a presence on T-mall, Alibaba Group’s popular Chinese platform.


But Golden won’t just lean on global markets for growth. 

He also wants Roots to build out its 

home, 

camping 

and hospitality businesses 

without forgetting, 

well, its roots.

The retailer was started by Michigan natives Michael Budman and Don Green, who met at an Ontario summer camp in the sixties and decided to open what eventually became Roots north of the border in 1973. 

The brand, which sells apparel like sweatpants and leather accessories including bags, has since become a beloved symbol of Canadiana.

“The DNA of the brand is incredible,” said Golden, who labelled himself a “longtime admirer of Roots and father of two girls who have the company’s clothing in their closets.

“It is loved in its home market and it is loved around the world, so nothing here is broken.

 This is really about just continuing to build it out.”

He offered his insights into Marquee’s hopes for the brand a day after Roots announced it has agreed to be acquired for $4.10 per share in cash — the result of a strategic review the retailer kicked off in March.

Its shares were up more than 10 per cent or roughly 35 cents to $4.06 in mid-morning trading Friday.

The deal still needs shareholder and regulatory approval but if it proceeds, 

Marquee will use JM&A Design and Development Inc. to 

develop, 

manufacture 

and distribute 

Roots clothing for Canadian and U.S. stores. 

JM&A is led by Joseph Mimran, the Canadian fashion visionary behind 

Joe Fresh, 

Club Monaco 

and Alfred Sung. 

He’s also the chairman of hat brand Tilley Endurables, 

clothing retailer Kit and Ace 

and toy shop Mastermind Toys.

Mimran was drawn to the partnership, in part because of how involved Marquee gets in its brands.


“When you have a partner like that, as opposed to somebody who just looks at a brand 

as a cash cow, 

it makes a huge difference,” 

he said in the same interview with Golden. 

“This is a very emotional brand. 

It’s an emotional brand for Canada 

and if you don’t have vested emotional owners, 

this thing can go terribly wrong.”

For now, it appears the two are on the same page, 

sharing a goal of figuring out how they can best steward the brand 

but also tailor it to a global audience.

It’s a lofty task, Mimran admits, but one he feels more than prepared for, especially because founder Green sent him a “beautiful” note expressing confidence in the arrangement.

“I always feel pressure,” Mimran said. 

“This is a pressure-filled industry. 

It’s season by season, 

it’s a product at a time, 

but I’ve been doing it for a long time.”

The key will be nailing the product side of the business 

because that’s what customers care about, 

Mimran said.

While the specifics of how the brand could transform under its possible new ownership are still taking shape, Roots CEO Meghan Roach signalled she doesn’t expect anything dramatic.

“I don’t think you going to see a Roots brand that doesn’t look like the brand you expect,” she said. 

“I think you’re going to see this team putting in place 

a lot exciting things 

that are going to bring the brand forward in really good ways.”

Roach and Golden demurred when asked if she’d be staying in the top role following a sale. Roach said it was too early for such decisions.

She joined Roots as interim chief financial officer about seven years ago, rising later to its top job. 

Before that, Roach had worked at private equity firm Searchlight Capital Partners L.P., which bought a majority stake in Roots from its founders in 2015.

Under Roach, the goal was to return the retailer to a position of strength. 

She worked to do that by moving the retailer 

away from markdowns 

and fashioning itself into more of a prestige brand

that occasionally partnered with the popular franchises like the Toronto Blue Jays and Toronto Tempo.

---

Tara Deschamps, The Canadian Press

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Aug. 21, 2026.

https://www.bnnbloomberg.ca/business/company-news/2026/08/21/possible-new-roots-owner-threads-plan-for-global-growth/



Sept. 7, 2026 "New Lululemon CEO faces multifront battle to refashion company’s edge": Today I found this article on BNN Bloomberg:


Come Tuesday, Heidi O’Neill will likely have the loftiest to-do list in all of Canadian retail.

The former Nike executive is taking over one of the country’s most cherished brands — Lululemon Athletica Inc. — at a time when it’s lost a lot of its lustre.

Her job? Prove the 28-year-old athleisure retailer is down but not out.

“It’s a herculean task,” said Richard Leblanc, a governance, law and ethics professor at York University. 

“The targets are moving 

and there are divergent interests 

and expectations from 

stakeholders, 

customers, 

employees, 

investors, 

the founder, 

board members, 

competitors. 

It will be very challenging.”

While the Vancouver-based company still notches the kind of revenues most Canadian retailers would be envious of, 

they’ve been shrinking

and the company’s Nasdaq-listed stock price has dropped from its peak of around

US$500 in December 2023 

to roughly $100 lately.

It’s been criticized for a lack of 

new styles, 

had to temporarily remove a leggings line that was too see-through 

and abandoned another that gave customers’ backsides a whale tail look.

Overshadowing much of that up until recently was an 

ugly, public spat with its founder,

who’s grown incensed by the direction of the company 

and its inability to keep up with hot, new competitors like Alo and Vuori.

O’Neill will take Lululemon’s reins months after that founder, Chip Wilson, agreed in May to pause disparaging the brand — but she still has her work cut out for her.

“She’s fighting a multifront war,” said Leblanc. 

“It’s investors, 

talent, 

the boardroom 

and strategy, 

so she really has to have her ducks in line

and hit the ground running on day one.”

Lululemon declined to comment for this story or make O’Neill available for an interview.

However, it pointed The Canadian Press toward a Thursday call with analysts where interim chief executive Meghan Frank said the company expects O’Neill 

“will take a deep dive into the business, 

evaluating our strategy 

and current action plan.”

Among O’Neill’s first tasks will be building relations with a fractured board, 

including two new members hand-picked by Wilson in exchange for an 18-month break from him publicly attacking the brand. 

A third board pick, with apparel product and brand experience, has been promised to him by Oct. 1 but has yet to be named.

Making sure the board members and O’Neill are all on the same page is crucial from the start because it can impact 

how much resistance a CEO’s ideas will face in the future 

and how much leeway they are given to govern.

“What you don’t want … is a new CEO fighting the board. 

You want the board and the CEO to be aligned, 

so the CEO can focus her 2,500 hours a year 

on beating the competition 

and creating shareholder value,” 

Leblanc said.

At the same time, O’Neill will have to 

rebuild the company’s ranks 

and quickly inspire loyalty.

When Lululemon carried out a layoff last year that partially struck its headquarters, 

it sent unaffected staff fleeing to nearby rivals like Arc’teryx, 

said Laurent Vasilescu, senior analyst at BNP Paribas Equity Research, in a recent note to investors.

The last year of turmoil has only exacerbated that flow, he said.

In August, Lululemon lost its chief artificial intelligence and technology officer after less than a year 

and its longtime chief strategy officer after 14. 

Its chief communications officer was also scheduled to leave days before O’Neill took the helm.

Departures so close to a new CEO’s reign are “increasingly concerning,” 

Vasilescu said, while predicting 

“there may be more employee turnover over the coming months.”

Retail watchers say the transformation O’Neill will have to preside over should repair Lululemon’s executive ranks as much as its store shelves.

“Lululemon has lost its innovative edge. 

It has become boring and predictable, 

and it’s simply not justifying its price points in the way it once did,” 

Neil Saunders, managing director of GlobalData, said.

“The response to this so far has been to try and add more general casualwear pieces to the assortment. 

Unfortunately, this has confused some shoppers and has weakened Lululemon’s reputation for being on the cutting edge of athleisure.”

Lululemon needs to get back to convincing customers its products are worth the premium prices 

by launching merchandise that prioritizes fit and comfort, 

innovating with new fabrics and technology 

and injecting fashion into final designs, 

Saunders reasons.

An update to Lululemon stores also wouldn’t hurt. Some of its locations are looking “quite uninteresting,” he said.

If Lululemon refreshed its product offerings and stores, 

Saunders thinks it would help win back customers and get them to spend more.

That, in turn, would help with what he sees as the company’s biggest challenge:

convincing critics Lululemon hasn’t hit its North American ceiling.

Analysts have worried Lululemon has saturated its home market as it can 

because recent quarters brought declines in its North American revenues.

Turning things around won’t be easy because the market is 

“way more competitive” 

and athleisure spending has slowed, 

Saunders said.

Yet he thinks O’Neill can more than handle these tasks.

While Lululemon’s stock dipped after her April appointment announcement, she’s no retail rookie. 

He credits her with transforming Nike’s women’s business 

from a sub-category 

into a multi-billion-dollar growth driver.

Lululemon said she was also instrumental in 

reducing Nike’s product development timelines, 

speeding up its release schedule 

and shaping the business into a US$45 billion global leader.

While many investors will want to see that same prowess at Lululemon, Leblanc thinks they won’t have much patience.

After all, they spent the winter and spring waiting for Lululemon to name its next CEO and then, 

the summer waiting for O’Neill to start while the clock ticked down on Wilson’s silence.

They’ll want her to quickly find her footing, 

deliver a turnaround plan 

and win their loyalty, 

he said, so “the pressure is on to get it right coming out of the gate.”

This report by Tara Deschamps, The Canadian Press, was first published Sept. 6, 2026.

https://www.bnnbloomberg.ca/business/company-news/2026/09/07/new-lululemon-ceo-faces-multifront-battle-to-refashion-companys-edge/