Friday, July 7, 2023

"The Facebook Searchers" ("The Social Network")/ "The price of education" (Harvard Business School is bad)

Here are 2 negative articles about Harvard:


"The Facebook Searchers": I cut out this article by David Brooks in the National Post on Oct. 7, 2010.  Here's the whole article:


In 1952, two-thirds of Harvard applicants were admitted. The average verbal SAT score for incoming freshmen was 583. If your father went to Harvard, you had a 90 percent chance of getting in.

Harvard’s president at the time, James Bryant Conant, decided to change that. Harvard could no longer be about birth and WASP breeding, he realized. It had to promote intelligence and merit. Within eight years, the average freshman had a verbal score of 678 and a math score of 695. 

New sorts of people were going to Harvard — more intellectual and less blue blood. But Conant didn’t want his school to be home to unidimensional brainiacs. He hoped to retain the emphasis on character.
         
In “The Social Network,” the director David Fincher and the screenwriter Aaron Sorkin imagine that these two Harvards still exist side by side. On top, there is the old WASP Harvard of Mayflower families, regatta blazers and Anglo-Saxon cheekbones. Underneath, there is the largely Jewish and Asian Harvard of brilliant but geeky young strivers.

This social structure will be familiar to moviegoers. From “Animal House” through “Revenge of the Nerds,” it has provided the basic plotline for most collegiate movies. But as sociology, of course, it’s completely fanciful.

The old WASP Harvard is dead. As Nathan Heller writes in an intelligent blog post called “You Can’t Handle the Veritas,” (Sorkin also wrote “A Few Good Men”), most kids at Harvard today come from pressure-cooker suburban schools. The old clubs are “vestigial curios.” Computer geeks do not spend their days desperately trying to join the Protestant Establishment because people born in 1984 don’t know what it is.

Still, if the “The Social Network” is bad sociology, it is very good psychology. The movie does a brilliant job dissecting the sorts of people who become stars in an information economy and a hypercompetitive, purified meritocracy. It deftly captures what many of them have and what they lack, what they long for and what they end up with.

The character loosely based on Mark Zuckerberg, a co-founder of Facebook, is incredibly smart. Over the years, movies like “Good Will Hunting” have delighted in showing acts of mental superheroism. 

Educated audiences seem to experience wish-fulfillment ecstasy while watching their heroes effortlessly leap hard math problems in a single bound. Zuckerberg does that a few times in “The Social Network.”

But he is also intense. Success these days isn’t just a product of intelligence. It’s the brain and the thyroid together: I.Q. married to energy and a relentless desire to be the best. In this way, the Zuckerberg character is as elitist as the old Harvardians, just on different grounds.

What he is lacking is even more striking. The Zuckerberg character is without social and moral skills. It’s not that he’s a bad person. 

He’s just never been house-trained. He’s been raised in a culture reticent to talk about social and moral conduct. The character becomes a global business star without getting a first-grade education in interaction.

There is a propelling mismatch between his intellectual skills and his social and moral ones. Desperately, he longs to fill the hole. In the first scene, he tries with a one-way verbal barrage that is designed to impress but ends up repelling the girl he loves. 

Then he does it by creating the social network itself — trying to use the medium he understands to conquer the medium he doesn’t.

In Fincher and Sorkin’s handling, Zuckerberg is a sympathetic character because despite all his bullying, he deeply feels what he lacks, and works tirelessly to fill the hole. In a world of mentor magnets and eager-to-please climbers, he is relentlessly inner-directed. But this is a movie propelled by deficiency, not genius.

The central tension of the picture is between his outward success and his inner failure. 

It seems to be a tragic and recurring feature of life that the people who work to design great products for the golden circle find after they are finished that they are still unable to join it.

In the 20th century, immigrant Hollywood directors made hyperpatriotic movies that defined American life but found after fame and fortune they were still outsiders. In this movie, Zuckerberg designs a fabulous social network, but still has his reciprocity problem. 

He is still afflicted by his an 

hedonic self-consciousness, 

his failure to communicate, 

his inability to lose himself in the throngs at a party 

or the capacity to deserve the love he craves.

Many critics have compared this picture to “Citizen Kane.” But I was reminded of the famous last scene in “The Searchers,” in which the John Wayne character is unable to join the social bliss he has created. The character gaps that propel some people to do something remarkable can’t be overcome simply because they have managed to change the world.



Mar. 8, 2021: There are 122 comments,  so I read a couple of them.

Whatever
Austin, TexasOct. 8, 2010

I had an ex-boyfriend who was very smart, but just couldn't give himself emotionally. He could tell you all about volumes of trivia and read non-fiction, but any time you asked him for some recognition of true feeling, he pulled back.


Though he never said it, he constantly looked down on me because I didn't have a high paying job (he was a programmer), I didn't have influential friends (nor did I enjoy networking), and my grades in college weren't as good as his (of course, I worked more jobs than he did).


I truly appreciated this movie because of its degradation of women (the unspoken truth about elite universities where if you're not a model-and even if you are-you don't deserve respect), the obsession with success to the detriment of all else, and the notion that money can fix all ills.


There are so many people who glorify this life and it's truly sad, but there's nothing to be done about it. Those people would have to see a flaw in their behavior and as long as they have money, they don't.

Elizabeth Fuller commented October 8, 2010
Elizabeth Fuller
Peterborough, NHOct. 8, 2010

The thing is, there are a lot of socially adept human beings who are ruthless and amoral. Let's not be too quick to label those really smart human beings who aren't party people as anhedonic and trying to fill gaps in their lives. Some of them may be quite happy and productive. Amorality comes in all shapes and sizes.




May 29, 2017 "The price of education": Today I found this article by Trevor Cole in the Globe and Mail.  I never thought I would say this, but: "Harvard Business School is bad."  Here's the proof:


Review: Duff McDonald’s The Golden Passport is a window into the soul of mercantile America

How terrible a plague upon the modern world is the Harvard Business School? Over the school’s 109-year existence, how much of the injustice, venality and misery ingrained in Western economies can be laid at the feet of the school’s professors and their wealthy MBA spawn?

Those weren’t questions Canadian journalist Duff McDonald set out to answer when he began writing this mammoth accounting of the history and impact of America’s most prominent and influential graduate school for business. 

McDonald insists that, when it came to ol’ HBS, he had, at the outset of his 30-month process, no particular axe to grind. But as he paged through the annals and waded through the evidence, he couldn’t ignore what he was seeing. Pretty soon, it seems that McDonald came to much the same conclusion as McGill University’s Henry Mintzberg, who in 2012 called MBAs “a menace to society,” and MIT professor John Van Maanen, who said in 2015 that the innumerable CEOs educated at HBS had left the world “a much worse place.”

You’d like some proof? 

Consider that America’s military failures during the war in Vietnam can be traced back to the analytical methods that Defense Secretary Robert McNamara learned at HBS.

Consider that many of the bankers and executives most responsible for the 2007 financial crisis were HBS graduates doing exactly what HBS graduates had been taught to do – go for the money, damn the consequences. 

Consider that George W. Bush, until recently viewed as the Worst President Ever, graduated with an MBA from the Harvard Business School.

That’s just the highlight reel of HBS sins. To cover the rest, McDonald needs almost 600 pages.

And it all began, like many disasters, so innocuously. Back in the early-to-mid 1800s, long before HBS existed, North American society looked down on business and the men who practised it. The smart sons of the wealthiest families went into the professions, became doctors or lawyers, while the dim bulbs slouched off to make and sell things.

Slowly that began to change. By 1900 there were more than 500,000 factories in the United States, and more and more ambitious youths were drawn to the money-making potential of a life in commerce. 

Business colleges sprang up to meet the demand for training. That’s when the decision makers at Harvard and the Boston Brahmins who funded it came up with a plan: If they couldn’t persuade their young men to choose a suitably prestigious profession over business, they’d just redefine business as a prestigious profession.

“Business in its upper walks has become a highly intellectual calling,” said Harvard president Charles Eliot to the Harvard Club of Connecticut in 1908. That same year, he opened the Harvard Business School with an ambitious goal: to be “a force for good.”

The first seeds for the trouble to come were laid there, in that early arrogance. HBS, McDonald says, set out to produce “a more enlightened businessman” and quickly became “intoxicated with its own importance.” 

In attempting to elevate the role of the manager to something exalted and yet teachable, HBS and its professors became convinced that it was true. Around that presumption, other seeds of misfortune began to take root.

This is the third book of what McDonald calls his trilogy of American business. The first two dipped into the worlds of banking (Last Man Standing, on the career of JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon) and management consulting (The Firm, a history of the hugely influential consultancy McKinsey & Co.). 

Of the three, Golden Passport is by far the most ambitious, and in McDonald’s hands this history of the Harvard Business School, its successes and failures, misdeeds and misapprehensions, becomes a window into the increasingly corrupted soul of mercantile America.

In building his case that HBS has done far more harm than good over the years, McDonald marches resolutely through the 20th century, decade by decade, describing in fine detail the economic forces at play, the evolving attitudes of the marketplace and the arguments of its leading thinkers, both inside and outside the school. 

Along the way, he profiles the HBS deans and professors who rose to prominence, usually on the back of some grand new theory about the keys to managerial and commercial success.

 He charts the path of each of these theories – the stopwatch metric of “Taylorism,” for example, which stressed the value of quantity over quality, 

or much later, Michael Jensen’s version of agency theory, linking executive compensation to shareholder return – from its heroic, profitable rise to its inevitable repudiation and fall.

At each stage, McDonald keeps an eye on the challenges lurking around the corner. As he describes the self-satisfaction that permeated the halls of HBS and the minds of its graduates in the prosperous 1950s, for example, he also clangs the bell about the coming global business pressures that no one at the school foresaw. 

A sense of the intellectual shallowness of HBS wafts through the entire book, as McDonald makes a mockery of the very idea of treating business as a profession.

Again and again he returns to the subject of the school’s signature teaching practice – the case method. While business theories have come and gone through the school’s history, the case method has endured, and HBS embraces the approach like no other school on earth (although the University of Western Ontario’s Ivey Business School comes close). 

Every year, HBS students read and then argue over hundreds of reported cases describing a real business problem, the executive response and the result (perhaps the most famous example being the story of how Johnson & Johnson CEO James Burke guided the company through the 1982 Tylenol crisis, when poison-laced bottles of Tylenol killed seven people in Chicago). 

The school has always claimed that the case method gives students the equivalent of real-world experience, teaching them how to think through problems and equipping them to be effective leaders. 

McDonald chops away at that notion, articulating the many problems with the case method, such as the inward focus it creates – a method taught by HBS students-turned-professors who’ve only learned through that method with no awareness of the outside world – or the fact that the chief skill it teaches students is to be glib, “to think on their feet and to argue with conviction, even if they don’t entirely know what they’re talking about.”

Throughout The Golden Passport (the title is an allusion to the success and riches practically guaranteed to every Harvard MBA), McDonald’s tone is deliciously derisive. He quickly establishes a pattern wherein he describes some proposition or assumption promoted by HBS thinkers, sets it on display for the reader to fully appreciate, and then strikes it down with a cruel stroke, using words such as “absurd” and “hilarious” and “a crock.” 

Over time, reading this history of America’s most prestigious business school comes to feel like hearing the life story of an esteemed man as told by his smirking, smart-ass younger brother.

But by sheer thoroughness, McDonald makes his case, until the follies of the Harvard Business School, and the calamities that grew from them, are laid bare. Early in the book, McDonald brings up education critic Abraham Flexner, who in 1930 warned that HBS was pretentious enough to be dangerous. 

Anyone who makes it all the way through The Golden Passport – anyone, that is, not mentioned among the many lists of people who have profited handsomely from their association with HBS – would have to conclude he was right.

Trevor Cole’s most recent book is The Whisky King.

https://www.theglobeandmail.com/arts/books-and-media/book-reviews/review-duff-mcdonalds-the-golden-passport-is-a-window-into-the-soul-of-mercantile-america/article35122696/



May 16, 2021 Post Secret:

Classic secret:




This week's theme is about criticizing Harvard.  

I only have enough articles criticizing Harvard for 2 blog posts.


"What we can learn from Kanye West's public struggles"/ "AnnaLynne McCord reveals she has dissociative identity disorder. Experts explain what that means"

http://badcb.blogspot.com/2017/01/mental-health-celeb.html


"Harvard battles lawsuit over admission practices"/ "End affirmative action discrimination in Canada"/ Bridging the Gap (BTG) at YMCA

http://badcb.blogspot.com/2020/05/job-articles-dead-reference-harvard-done.html


Jul. 2, 2023 Leonora's gender reveal/ baby shower party: I was invited to this.  Leonora paid for the Uber and that picked me up and then picked up 2 other friends to her house.  

The party was 1:30-4:30pm.  

I met a lot of new people like Leonora's stepmom and dad, and her other friends.  I also saw Krista there.  Leonora, Krista, and I all worked at the 1st Restaurant job together.

There were like 5 dogs there.  

I ate 2 hotdogs and some chips.


Leonora, her boyfriend, and his daughter drove me home.  They came and looked at the crib that my family and I still had.  This was used when my siblings and I were babies.  The crib is at least 30 yrs old and I gave it to them for free.

Uber ride: I chatted with the driver Omar.  He's a black guy and he said he's a mechanic on the weekdays, and drives for Uber on the weekends.

He prefers to drive people instead of deliver food for Uber Eats, because if he gets lost, there is a real person telling him where to go.

Uber Eats: I have went to a fast food place, and an East Indian woman was a Uber Eats driver and had a baby in the car.

I was waiting for the bus, and I saw an Asian man deliver food to this house.  He had 2 kids sitting in the back with a tablet. 

If you have kids, then you can bring them along with you as you're delivering food.


Jul. 5, 2023 Dental office job interview: The interview was average.  I did show my interest and asked questions about the position.

Buses: My bus was supposed to come at 10:15 am.  There was another one that could come at 10:34.  The bus came at 10:46 am and on the screen it said it was 2.7 min. late.  I told the bus driver about it.

I was still on time for the interview.



Jul. 5, 2023 "Federal grocery rebate payments start rolling out today": Today I found this on CBC.  This is good news where the government is really helping people.  I got the grocery rebate in the mail yesterday:

Grocery rebate payments from the federal government are expected to start landing in eligible Canadians' bank accounts today.

The government has billed the one-time payment as targeted inflation relief for some 11 million low- and modest-income households.

It repeats the temporary boost to the GST rebate the government offered last year to address growing cost-of-living concerns. Those eligible for the GST rebate as of January 2023 will be eligible for the one-time top up; no application is required.




Jul. 6, 2023 "Why McDonald's menu items are different prices, even in the same city":

Today I found this article by Danielle Nerman on CBC:


To determine if this was an anomaly or a trend, Cost of Living used the McDonald's mobile app to compare the price of 20 Chicken McNuggets at every McDonald's restaurant in Calgary. CBC queued up the order on the app, but changed locations before finalizing it to see different location's prices (without buying hundreds of nuggets in the process).

This data was then plugged into a map to illustrate how much the price of McNuggets can vary within one city. In Calgary, they ranged from $11.69 to $16.39 — and in some cases, McDonald's restaurants located just a few kilometres apart had significant price differences. 

https://www.cbc.ca/radio/costofliving/why-mcdonald-s-menu-items-are-different-prices-even-in-the-same-city-1.6891476

My opinion: Shop around by using the app to see how much it costs.



Leo opinion:


 Is your phobia preventing you from living your life to its fullest?

No

51.25% (2119)

I don't have a phobia

35.70% (1476)

Yes

13.06% (540)




My answer: I would say no.  I would have to think about this some more like:


Are you afraid of success?


No comments: