Friday, July 1, 2022

"Client testifies Edmonton matchmaking consultant played on insecurities"/ "Edmonton matchmaking consultant found not guilty of high pressure sales tactics" (Edmonton Matchmakers)

Jun. 20, 2022 Edmonton Matchmakers: This company is a total scam.  Here are 2 articles about it:


Located in: Strathcona Town Centre

Address: 7915 104 St NW Unit 230, Edmonton, AB T6E 4E1

Phone: (780) 571-8370


Jan. 11, 2019 "'You will be a lonely old woman': Client testifies Edmonton matchmaking consultant played on insecurities": Today I found this article by Andrea Huncar on CBC news:






When Val Taylor met with Edmonton Matchmakers, she says the dating consultant suggested her weight was the reason she hadn't met anyone.

Taylor hesitated over the $7,344 price. She said that made the consultant Sharon Claire Jones go from "nice Claire" to "evil Claire."

According to Taylor, Jones became aggressive and raised her voice to tell her "You will be a lonely old woman by yourself for the rest of your life."

"It made me feel well maybe she's correct and maybe it's the only chance in the world I will have to meet someone," said Taylor, 56.

In her testimony Thursday in provincial court, Taylor said the appointment at Edmonton Matchmakers on July 17, 2015 left her feeling defeated and afraid.

Taylor was the only witness at a one-day trial for Jones who is charged under the Fair Trading Act after an investigation by Service Alberta.

Jones has pleaded not guilty to exerting undue pressure on consumers to enter into a transaction.

A conviction for the offence carries a maximum penalty of $300,000 and two years in jail.

Jones occasionally shook her head as she listened to Taylor's testimony but didn't take the stand.

A court exhibit showed Taylor had signed a document acknowledging it could be more difficult for the company to set her up with dates because of her weight. 

"I just wanted to get out of that room so I said I would sign," recalled Taylor, a medical lab technologist, who eventually put the payment on two credit cards.

Crown prosecutor Fraser Genuis argued Jones played on his client's insecurities saying, "If that's not seeking to exploit the vulnerability of someone seeking a matchmaking service, I'm not sure what is."

Defence lawyer Evan McIntyre questioned why Taylor had only complained to Service Alberta in April 2017, nearly two years after her appointment.

He argued Taylor willingly signed the contract but her story "keeps getting worse."

McIntyre pointed out that Taylor hadn't protested at the time, or cancelled her contract before the first date.

"You sat there in silence didn't you?," said McIntyre during cross examination.

"Silence and fear," Taylor responded.

Treated courteously

But McIntyre produced a document signed by Taylor that stated she was treated courteously and provided with adequate information.

"It does not correspond here to testimony in court three-and-a-half years later," said McIntyre.

Service Alberta has received 19 complaints about Edmonton Matchmakers between 2015 and 2018. Four complaints were investigated but this is the only case where charges were laid.

CBC first reported on Edmonton Matchmakers in April 2017 after Margaret Clark launched a lawsuit complaining that she only went on a single date after spending thousands of dollars on the service.

The story prompted Taylor to come forward about her own matchmaking woes with the company who sent her on a date with a "partially toothless," homeless man.

In court Thursday Taylor said she emphasized to Jones that any suitable match must be employed but her one and only date did not meet that criteria.

He said he was "happily unemployed" and had no intention of looking for a job because he planned to "bum around for the summer," recalled Taylor. He told her he lived at "no fixed address" and parked his camper on the side of the road or parking lots."

Judge D'Arcy DePoe said the contract, which locks someone in after the first date, appeared "incredibly one-sided." But DePoe expressed doubt over whether it could amount to undue influence. 

He said he was troubled by the document Taylor signed indicating she was pleased with the service. 

DePoe has reserved his decision.

andrea.huncar@cbc.ca
@andreahuncar

'You will be a lonely old woman': Client testifies Edmonton matchmaking consultant played on insecurities | CBC News


Feb. 27, 2019 "Edmonton matchmaking consultant found not guilty of high pressure sales tactics": Today I found this article by Andrea Huncar on CBC news:

A former employee of a dating company has been found not guilty of pressuring an Edmonton woman into buying a $7,000 membership.

On Tuesday, judge D'Arcy DePoe acquitted Sharon Claire Jones, who previously worked for Edmonton Matchmakers, of exerting undue pressure on consumers to enter into a transaction.

"I cannot find the Crown has proven the case beyond a reasonable doubt," DePoe said.

Last summer, Jones was charged with three offences under the Fair Trading Act, two of which were dropped before going to trial.

The Jan. 10 trial on the remaining charge hinged on evidence from former client Val Taylor, who filed a complaint with Service Alberta in April 2017, after signing up with Edmonton Matchmakers in July 2015.

Taylor said her one and only date was with an unemployed, homeless man — far from the criteria she had laid out in her appointment with Jones.

In court last month, Taylor said when she deferred her decision to sign up, she was berated by Jones. Jones slammed her hands on the desk and warned she would be a "lonely old woman," leaving her feeling demoralized and afraid, Taylor said.

According to DePoe, Taylor, who was not in court Tuesday, presented as sincere, and believed she was being truthful. But a survey filled out by Taylor after signing the contract was the "most important piece of evidence," DePoe said.

In the document, Taylor agreed that she was treated in a courteous, professional manner. She called Edmonton Matchmakers months later to find out what was going on, which indicated she still wanted the service, DePoe said.

"It puts her evidence of … undue pressure into question," DePoe concluded.

'Strong evidence'

Jones was very happy with the judge's decision, her lawyer Evan McIntyre said afterwards.

He said the complaint wasn't filed by Taylor until nearly two years after her appointment but the survey showed how she felt about Jones' service at the time.

"We felt that was strong evidence of the complaint and state of mind at the time she purchased the contract directly after interacting with my client," said McIntyre.

Taylor filed a complaint after Margaret Clark went public about her lawsuit against Edmonton Matchmakers detailing how she bought a $10,000 membership but only went on a single date.

Her story inspired others to file complaints with the province. In total, Service Alberta received 19 complaints against Edmonton Matchmakers. Four were investigated but only Taylor's case made it to trial.

But McIntyre said Jones felt she had always treated her customers fairly and courteously and the issue of the complaints seemed to be with the company itself, which has since changed ownership. Jones no longer works there either.

"She left actually when these other complaints started to come forward and she wasn't satisfied with the answers she was getting about these complaints. She was surprised about them as well," said McIntyre, adding that the case has been incredibly stressful on Jones.

"So it was really nice for my client, very satisfying for her to get her day in court, and to show the truth of these allegations," said McIntyre.

Despite the ruling, DePoe criticized the contract as being "extremely one-sided," containing "vague terms" and being written in a way to "absolve the company of any blame."

andrea.huncar@cbc.ca @andreahuncar

Edmonton matchmaking consultant found not guilty of high pressure sales tactics (yahoo.com)



These articles remind me of this because it's about people telling others about their bad experiences with this company:


"#MeToo movement becomes #WeToo in in victim-blaming Japan"/ "Outrage as women in Japan told not wear glasses in the workplace"


Aug. 17, 2020 Saying: I found this on Facebook:

"You never look good when you are trying to make someone else look bad."- Unknown

Cham: Sometimes people need to be exposed for who they are hahah or maybe I should stop being petty

Tracy Au: There's a difference between trying to make someone look bad, and exposing them for who they are. It's like those #MeToo accusers and victims, they are plainly telling everybody about the perpetrators. They're not trying to make them look bad.





My opinion: Don't go to Edmonton Matchmakers.

1. They take your money and only give you one match.

2. The match is inappropriate and not what you wanted at all.

3. There are 6 negative news articles about 2 women who complained about it.  There are 19 complaints altogether.

4. The story about how Val Taylor went on a date with a homeless guy was like a "horror date" from this website ecrush.com.  I used to go there as a teen and people send in their stories about these terrible dates they went on.

5. They don't even have a company website.


This week's theme is about how Edmonton Matchmakers is a scam:


"Edmonton woman sues dating service after paying thousands of dollars for a single date"/ "Edmonton woman raises alarm over matchmaking service" (Edmonton Matchmakers)

Tracy's blog: "Edmonton woman sues dating service after paying thousands of dollars for a single date"/ "Edmonton woman raises alarm over matchmaking service" (Edmonton Matchmakers) (badcb.blogspot.com)


"Service Alberta investigating complaints against Edmonton matchmaking company"/ "Charges laid after Edmonton clients complain about matchmaking service" (Edmonton Matchmakers)

Tracy's blog: "Service Alberta investigating complaints against Edmonton matchmaking company"/ "Charges laid after Edmonton clients complain about matchmaking service" (Edmonton Matchmakers) (badcb.blogspot.com)


My week:


Jun. 25, 2022 "More than $100,000 raised for loyal Burger King employee of 27 years in GoFundMe campaign after video shows him getting 'goody' bag as reward": Today I found this article by Jordan Hart on MSN.com:

  • Burger King employee went viral on TikTok for the gift bag he received on his 27th work anniversary.
  • Saturday Night Live alum, David Spade, donated $5,000 to the GoFundMe created by Ford's daughter.
  • "Some people got nothing, so I was just happy to get anything," Ford said in an interview.



Burger King employee Kevin Ford is receiving a flood of donations on GoFundMe after video of a prize bag he received on his 27th work anniversary went viral on Twitter.

Ford has worked as a cook and cashier at the Burger King in the Las Vegas McCarran International Airport for 27 years without missing a day, according to his viral video posted in June.

Although the video gained most of its attention on Twitter, it was originally posted on TikTok. In the clip, he receives a single movie ticket, a Starbucks cup, and some candy in a plastic drawstring backpack.

He refers to the goody bag as a "reward" for his years of loyalty to the franchise. But despite his appreciation for the gift, many online criticized it as lackluster for an employee of almost three decades, Yahoo News reports.

In a TMZ interview, Ford admitted to feeling "let down" by the gesture, but maintained that he was grateful for the recognition. Compared to the monetary gifts employees received before the pandemic, he said he felt the goody bag didn't really measure up.

His daughter, Seryna, created a GoFundMe page following the huge reaction on social media. She wrote, "My dad continues to work here, because though he does look young, he is coming up on retirement age and leaving would cost him his retirement."

Ford took on the job 27 years ago as a single father after he was granted full custody of his two eldest daughters. 

He continued to work at Burger King to provide health care for all four of his daughters throughout school, according to the GoFundMe description.

Seryna let potential donors know that Ford wasn't in desperate need of financial support, but the money would help him to visit his grandchildren in Texas.

The fundraiser quickly exceeded its original goal, and is continuing to get donations even after hitting $100,000. One notable donor was comedian David Spade who donated $5,000 to Ford and encouraged him to "keep up the good work," TMZ reports.

Burger King addressed the criticism it's received in a statement: "The Burger King brand and its many franchisees nationwide are committed to recognizing and celebrating the achievements of the thousands of people serving across a wide range of roles — all dedicated to providing our Guests a world-class experience."

More than $100,000 raised for loyal Burger King employee of 27 years in GoFundMe campaign after video shows him getting 'goody' bag as reward (msn.com)


Jun. 27, 2022 "‘Too much mayonnaise’: Subway worker shot to death after sandwich argument": Today I found this article by Michelle Butterfield on Global news:

A fight over how much mayonnaise is too much has ended in the death of a Subway worker in Atlanta, police have confirmed.

According to WBRZ in Atlanta, a customer shot two Subway workers after a complaint about his sandwich on Sunday evening.

Officers with the Atlanta Police Department (APD) responded to a Circle K gas station just after 6:30 p.m. after receiving a call that a person had been shot.

They found that two female employees inside the neighbouring Subway had been shot. One of the employees, 26, died at the scene, while the other, 24, was rushed to hospital.

“Believe it or not, it was about too much mayonnaise on his sandwich,” Willie Glenn, the owner of the store, told FOX 5. “He decided to escalate the situation and from there, that’s when all hell broke loose.”

Interim police chief Darin Schierbaum told the Atlanta Journal-Constitution the 24-year-old woman was shot in front of her five-year-old child, who was in the store visiting at the time.

“What you are seeing behind me is the result of a tragedy,” Schierbaum told reporters from outside the Subway. “A senseless tragedy that we’ve seen numerous times throughout the year where an argument leads to gunfire, and now we have someone dead.”

Police told reporters the on-duty manager tried to return fire on the shooter, but missed and the shooter fled the scene.

A 36-year-old suspect, who wasn’t named, was later arrested in connection with the shooting.

“This was a very tragic situation that did not have to occur,” Atlanta police Deputy Chief Charles Hampton Jr. told reporters Monday.

Authorities haven’t identified the victims, pending notification of family.

Glenn told WBS-TV that both victims had started working at the restaurant a few weeks ago and described them both as “model employees.”

Schierbaum told WSB-TV that people need to handle disputes differently, instead of quickly turning to guns.

“We need individuals to talk out their disputes, walk away and do not pick up guns. We can take down drug operations that breed violent crime, we can dismantle gang organizations that breed violent crime, we can stop robbery crews that breed violent crime, we cannot stop someone who is mad because there is too much mayonnaise on their sandwich,” said Schierbaum.

‘Too much mayonnaise’: Subway worker shot to death after sandwich argument - National | Globalnews.ca

My opinion: This is so bad.  The workers may have asked: "Let me make you another sandwich.  Is this enough mayo?"

I remember watching Jay Leno and "Ridiculous 911 calls":

Man: The sandwich is not what I wanted at all.

Woman 911 operator: Then don't buy the sandwich.

I have worked at 2 sandwich shops for about 5 years in total.


Posting Facebook photos: Yesterday I went to my friend's M's house to use her computer.  I didn't know and couldn't upload all these photos I took at her party a few weeks ago.  I then was able to.  

1. Put in your USB key.

2. Put in your digital camera.

3. You have to "create album" on Facebook.

4. Press "post".

This will upload all your photos.

I was there for 2 hrs.  My parents and grandma went to Costco at the time.

Jul. 1, 2022 Writing: It's the summer time, so I have been writing reviews of old TV shows.  There aren't a lot of scripted dramas to watch at this time.

The Endgame: I was watching this show on my DVR.  By watching all the episodes in a week, I find this show to be average.  This show got cancelled.

The Endgame (TV Series 2022) - IMDb

Ordinary Joe: I have been watching this show and I really like it.  I know this show got cancelled.

Ordinary Joe (TV Series 2021–2022) - IMDb

"Service Alberta investigating complaints against Edmonton matchmaking company"/ "Charges laid after Edmonton clients complain about matchmaking service" (Edmonton Matchmakers)

Jun. 20, 2022 Edmonton Matchmakers: This company is a total scam.  Here are 2 articles about it:

Located in: Strathcona Town Centre

Address: 7915 104 St NW Unit 230, Edmonton, AB T6E 4E1

Phone: (780) 571-8370


May 10, 2017 "Service Alberta investigating complaints against Edmonton matchmaking company": This article is by Andrea Huncar on CBC news:

Service Alberta is investigating four new complaints against a matchmaking company stemming from a CBC Edmonton investigation.

Minister Stephanie McLean said her department received the complaints after two dissatisfied customers spoke out against Edmonton Matchmakers in April. 

"I was absolutely heartbroken, both as the minister responsible for consumer protection and the minister of the status of women," McLean told Edmonton AM in an interview on Wednesday. "People being taken advantage of, especially women — it's really troubling."

McLean also expressed her gratitude to the women who publicly shared their stories.

"I'm thankful to the women who have come forward bravely and shared their stories because it does encourage others to come forward," she said.

In April, Margaret Clark, 67, was the first to raise concerns, shortly after launching a lawsuit against Canada Introductions, Inc., which operates as Edmonton Matchmakers.

She accused the company of using high-pressure sales tactics that convinced her to pay $10,494 for a membership at the Edmonton office located at 7915 104 St. in December 2014.

Clark said she only received one referral in more than two years and the match was incompatible. But the company refused to refund her money.

Service Alberta investigated in 2015 but concluded there wasn't enough evidence to take action against the company, prompting Clark to launch a civil suit and tell her story publicly.

"That's what needed to happen," said Clark. "My goal going forward was that this would never happen to anybody else. And hopefully there will be some closure for people at some point."

Her story encouraged several other women to contact CBC News. Val Taylor said Edmonton Matchmakers used the same high-pressure sales tactics to get her to pay $7,344 for a membership.

Taylor said she clearly stated that her matches must be employed but her sole coffee date was a "partially toothless," homeless man who "continuously chewed and destroyed plastic utensils."

Taylor said she immediately called the company, arguing the match didn't meet her criteria and shouldn't count as an introduction. But Edmonton Matchmakers disagreed.

The contract states that after clients receive their first referral they "will not be entitled to any refund."

'No longer in business'

On May 1, Canada Introductions filed a short dispute note, in response to Clark's claim. It states Canada Introductions "is no longer in business" and the operations were transferred to another company, also doing business as Edmonton Matchmakers, in March 2016.

In response to CBC inquiries and requests for interviews from the company, Rich Nichols, a strategic crisis communications consultant based in Dallas, Texas, contacted CBC News and provided written responses.

He said that AB Singles, Ltd. operates Edmonton Matchmakers. The new company "opened its business operations in Edmonton in April 2016" and "merely utilizes" the same name as the previous company, he said, adding "they are two legally separate and unaffiliated companies."

"AB Singles, Ltd., (doing business as) Edmonton Matchmakers, does NOT have a contractual relationship with Margaret Clark," he wrote.

CBC confirmed two weeks ago that Edmonton Matchmakers still operates at the same location in Edmonton where Clark purchased her membership, however.

"AB Singles, Ltd., (doing business as) Edmonton Matchmakers is NOT aware of any unhappy client complaints being filed with Service Alberta," Nichols added.

On May 1, Beverly Sandalack launched a lawsuit similar to Clark's, also through U-SUE, a small-claims court agent based in Calgary.

Sandalack's statement of claim names AB Singles, Ltd., operating in Calgary as Alberta Matchmakers, as the defendant.

She accuses the company of failing to provide her with any matches after paying $5,485.85 on Nov. 26, 2016.

Nichols said Sandalack and AB Singles, Ltd. have negotiated a settlement and the company has issued a partial refund.

McLean said the province's Fair Trading Act offers some consumer protection, depending on the facts and circumstances.

"But in any situation, 

a company cannot misrepresent their services,

 they can't misrepresent their offers or exaggerate savings, 

they cannot use aggressive pressure sales tactics to get you to sign a contract," she said.

"They can't grossly overcharge for their service which could be the case in these circumstances. For example, if only one match is provided or the match is grossly inappropriate in some way."

She said violating the legislation can result in penalties ranging from $3,000 to more serious criminal charges which could result in fines of up to $300,000 or two years in jail.

"I'm enthused that people are coming forward so we can investigate and hold companies accountable for their actions," she said.

andrea.huncar@cbc.ca         @andreahuncar



Jul. 12, 2018 "Charges laid after Edmonton clients complain about matchmaking service": This article by Andrea Huncar on CBC news:



An employee of a dating service accused of preying on vulnerable women is scheduled to make a court appearance Thursday facing charges under the Fair Trading Act.

Claire Jones of Edmonton Matchmakers faces three charges including 

exerting undue pressure on consumers to enter into a transaction 

and knowing the consumer would be unable to receive reasonable benefit. 

She is also charged with entering into a transaction representing services that could not be supplied.

Jones is scheduled to enter a plea in provincial court Thursday.

The charges, which were laid In May, came just over a year after two disgruntled customers told their stories to CBC.

A conviction for each offence carries a maximum penalty of $300,000 and imprisonment of two years. 

In April 2017, 68-year-old Margaret Clark went public with her experience about Edmonton Matchmakers, located in the Old Strathcona neighbourhood, to warn others looking for love.

Clark, who is also suing the company, said she endured more than two hours of high-pressure sales tactics where she was warned a woman of her age didn't have much time left to date.

She spent $10,494 for a single, ill-suited date and never received a second match despite sending numerous emails, she said.

Clark broke into a huge smile when she learned of the charges this week.

"Oh my heavens, I am so happy," said Clark, who praised the province for carrying out the investigation. "It pays to stand up to people and for sure not be bullied."

'The claws came out'

After Clark shared her story last year, CBC received emails from other dissatisfied customers.

Val Taylor, then 54, told CBC the salesperson's "claws came out" when she hesitated to purchase a membership for $7,344. Feeling intimidated, Taylor says she signed up but only received one match.

She said her date locked her into the contract but was far from the man of her dreams.

"He was partially toothless," recalled Taylor, who quickly discovered her date was unemployed and homeless. "He spent the entire time that we were sitting there having coffee chewing on plastic utensils and breaking them."

14 complaints

Service Alberta confirmed the charges stem from an investigation, related to Taylor's case, into the operations of Edmonton Matchmakers and Alberta Matchmakers (Calgary). The department said both are owned by AB Singles Ltd, which has been registered in Alberta since April 2016. Prior to that, the operations were owned by Canada Introductions Inc., officials added.

Service Alberta said it received 14 complaints about the matchmaking company between 2015 and 2018. Half resulted in investigations. One has since been closed due to an unfounded complaint while another resulted in a settlement. Four investigations are still open.

In an emailed statement, Service Alberta Minister Brian Malkinson said: "Service Alberta is active in ensuring the operations of Edmonton and Alberta Matchmakers are compliant, including inspecting business practices and processes.

"We understand how incredibly frustrating this must be for people. Especially, since all they wanted to do was find love and that's something that we can all relate to."

Despite enduring "horrible comments" on social media and a radio station that made fun of her after she went public, Taylor said speaking out was worth it.

Her hope now is that "Someone else is not going to be in the situation I was in."

CBC visited Edmonton Matchmakers this week but a woman who answered the locked door declined to identify herself or provide comment.

In May 2017, Canada Introductions filed a short dispute note in court, in response to Clark's statement of claim. It states Canada Introductions "is no longer in business" and the operations were transferred to another company, also doing business as Edmonton Matchmakers, in March 2016.

Charges laid after Edmonton clients complain about matchmaking service | CBC News


These articles remind me of this because it's about people telling others about their bad experiences with this company:


"#MeToo movement becomes #WeToo in in victim-blaming Japan"/ "Outrage as women in Japan told not wear glasses in the workplace"


Aug. 17, 2020 Saying: I found this on Facebook:

"You never look good when you are trying to make someone else look bad."- Unknown

Cham: Sometimes people need to be exposed for who they are hahah or maybe I should stop being petty

Tracy Au: There's a difference between trying to make someone look bad, and exposing them for who they are. It's like those #MeToo accusers and victims, they are plainly telling everybody about the perpetrators. They're not trying to make them look bad.


"Edmonton woman sues dating service after paying thousands of dollars for a single date"/ "Edmonton woman raises alarm over matchmaking service" (Edmonton Matchmakers)

Jun. 20, 2022 Edmonton Matchmakers: This company is a total scam.  Here are 2 

articles about it:


Located in: Strathcona Town Centre

Address: 7915 104 St NW Unit 230, Edmonton, AB T6E 4E1

Phone: (780) 571-8370


1 Google review:

8 months ago
Terrible


Apr. 13, 2017 "Edmonton woman sues dating service after paying thousands of dollars for a single date": Today I found this article by Andrea Huncar on CBC news:


A 67-year-old Edmonton woman is suing a matchmaking service after she spent thousands of dollars more than two years ago but only went on a single date.

"I know I'm not Nancy Sinatra but there must be someone out there who would have coffee with me," said Margaret Clark in an interview with Edmonton AM.

According to the lawsuit, Clark paid $10,494.75 in December 2014 for a membership with Edmonton Matchmakers at their office in Old Strathcona.

Less than a year later, the Texas attorney general's office shut down the company's U.S. affiliate, ordering Lone Star Introductions to pay a penalty of $500,000 for violating the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act.

In a statement of claim filed on March 31 in Calgary, Clark accused Canada Introductions Inc., which operates as Edmonton Matchmakers, of "using extreme and persistent high-pressure sales tactics."

"After two and a half hours, I felt like I was very low, my self-esteem had been bruised," Clark told CBC, recalling her initial appointment with the relationship consultant.

"She continuously bombarded me with questions: 

Why hadn't I met somebody at the church I attended? 

Why hadn't I dated anybody? 

That women my age didn't have much time left and these statements were made over and over again."

Clark was taking Oxycontin after a recent hip replacement surgery in addition to breaking her foot. The lawsuit says the sales person was "well aware" of Clark's health condition, but convinced her to pay $10,494.75 for a membership.

None of the allegations have been proven in court and a statement of defence has not been filed. Edmonton Matchmakers has not responded to CBC Edmonton's repeated requests for comment.

BBB reviews

The Better Business Bureau of Massachusetts confirmed Edmonton Matchmakers is affiliated with Lone Star Introductions, which also operates as eLove. In addition to the $500,000 fine, Lone Star was ordered to pay $20,000 in restitution to customers. The company was also found in violation of the Texas Internet Dating Safety Act and debt-collection regulations.

Clark's lawsuit notes eLove and Alberta Matchmakers are both registered trade names owned by Canada Introductions.

Edmonton's Better Business Bureau gives Edmonton Matchmakers a rating of A- but several customer reviews are less flattering.

They echo Clark's allegations of high-pressure sales tactics, unsuitable matches and a lack of referrals.

"In my case it was a very poor match," wrote one customer. "After that, you might as well just write your money off. There are no time requirements to provide anything. They could wait until you die."

Clark's contract states that after clients receive their first referral they "will not be entitled to any refund."

"We will provide to you a total of 16 referrals on an as-available basis," reads the contract, adding the company does not guarantee "the time it may take to find referrals for you based on your compatibility with our Membership base."

The lawsuit says Clark met her one match for a lunch date shortly after signing up. Both agreed they were "wrongfully mismatched." According to court documents, Clark never received another referral and her calls and emails to the company were not returned.

According to court documents, Clark concluded she had been "scammed" in March 2015 and called to demand her money back. The lawsuit seeks a full refund plus interest. She told CBC she felt angry and embarrassed but decided to go public to warn others.

Insufficient evidence of offence

Service Alberta investigated Clark's case in 2015 but found "insufficient evidence" to identify an offence or enforce regulations, said spokesperson Cheryl Tkalcic. 

"If new information becomes available and is shared with us, our consumer investigators would assess the information to determine if reopening the file is warranted."

Tkalcic said the Fair Trading Act protects consumers from unfair business practices such as being influenced to make a purchase, 

taking advantage of the buyer 

or representing goods that are of a different quality than promoted. 

She advised customers to review contract terms and refund policies, and ask questions.

Tkalcic is encouraging "those who are concerned about a similar transaction" to call the consumer contact centre at 1.877.427.4088.

andrea.huncar@cbc.ca                      

@andreahuncar

With files from CBC's Mark Harvey

Edmonton woman sues dating service after paying thousands of dollars for a single date | CBC News


Apr. 26, 2017 "'He was partially toothless': Edmonton woman raises alarm over matchmaking service": Today I found this article by Wallis Snowden on CBC news:

An Edmonton woman is urging buyer beware after she spent thousands of dollars with a matchmaking company but only went on a single date with a gap-toothed homeless man.

Val Taylor, 54, paid $7,344 for a membership with Edmonton Matchmakers at their office in Old Strathcona.  A company salesperson promised to find her a match, but Taylor says her single suitor was hardly the man of her dreams.

'Very surreal experience'

The date was shorter than her five-foot-10 frame, unemployed and homeless, she said in an interview with CBC Radio's Edmonton AM.

"He was partially toothless," she said. "And during our coffee, he continuously chewed and destroyed plastic utensils. It was a very surreal experience."

"I had very strictly specified that I'm not anybody's sugar mamma. I'm not dating any unemployed bums and this guy lived in a camper on the side of the road." 

Taylor decided to go public with her story after another Edmonton woman, Margaret Clark, filed a lawsuit against Canada Introductions Inc., which operates as Edmonton Matchmakers.

In a statement of claim filed March 31, Clark said she paid $10,494 for her membership — and a single date. She claims the company was "using extreme and persistent high-pressure sales tactics."  A statement of defence has not yet been filed in the case, and the allegations have not been proven in court.

'Hiding in my house in shame'

But Taylor said she too has serious concerns about the company.

"I thought, 'Oh my god, somebody went public with that,'  because I've been basically hiding in my house in shame since it happened," said Taylor. 

"I think it was very brave of her. I've long wanted to do something myself and bring this company to light because I'm sure Margaret and I are not the only two people out there."

Taylor went to the company's office in July of 2015 to inquire about a membership. She alleges that was subjected to an aggressive sales pitch, which "hacked away at her self-esteem." 

The contract with the company promised to provide her 12 "referrals" but not a successful match. An information package describes the service as a "premier matchmaking service for upscale and mature singles" with an "introduction process that has produced thousands of relationships."

She eventually agreed to sign on and filled out a form, asking for a match with an attractive and gainfully employed man close to her own age, she said. 

"Your self-esteem is already low when you go to someplace like that, because you're thinking I'm such a loser, I have to go to a company to find me a date," she said.

"And they use high-pressure sales tactics, and then when you tell them that you want to think about it, they berate you and make you feel like you've wasted their time and cost them money."

Within a week, she was set up with a date. It would be her first, and her last with the company. 

After her outing with the "toothless gentleman," Taylor said she complained immediately and asked for a full refund on her contract.

'Very, very fine writing'

She was flatly denied, and was never again matched on a date, she claims. 

"You can sign up for these different packages and in very, very fine writing it tells you that once you've had your first meeting, you're locked into the contract," she said. 

"And then they set you up with someone completely inappropriate. 

They set you up very quickly so you don't have time to change your mind, and then it's a brush-off after that."

Edmonton Matchmakers has not responded to CBC Edmonton's repeated requests for comment.

In 2015, the Texas attorney general's office shut down the company's U.S. affiliate, ordering Lone Star Introductions to pay a fine of $500,000 for violating the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act.

The Better Business Bureau of Massachusetts confirmed Edmonton Matchmakers is affiliated with Lone Star Introductions, which also operates as eLove.

In addition to the fine, Lone Star was ordered to pay $20,000 in restitution to customers. The company was also found in violation of the Texas Internet Dating Safety Act and debt-collection regulations.

Service Alberta investigated Clark's claim in 2015 but found "insufficient evidence" to identify an offence or enforce regulations. As of Wednesday, a Service Alberta spokesperson has not yet responded to a request for comment from CBC News. 

A number of negative reviews can be found on the Edmonton BBB page.

Taylor said she would like to see the matchmaking service investigated again. 

"These kind of companies need to be shut down because they're preying on vulnerable people and laughing all the way to the bank," she said.

With files from Mark Harvey


'He was partially toothless': Edmonton woman raises alarm over matchmaking service | CBC News


These articles remind me of this because it's about people telling others about their bad experiences with this company:


"#MeToo movement becomes #WeToo in in victim-blaming Japan"/ "Outrage as women in Japan told not wear glasses in the workplace"


Aug. 17, 2020 Saying: I found this on Facebook:

"You never look good when you are trying to make someone else look bad."- Unknown

Cham: Sometimes people need to be exposed for who they are hahah or maybe I should stop being petty

Tracy Au: There's a difference between trying to make someone look bad, and exposing them for who they are. It's like those #MeToo accusers and victims, they are plainly telling everybody about the perpetrators. They're not trying to make them look bad.