Friday, November 8, 2024

"Some voters aren't crazy about Trump. But they're supporting him anyway"/ "Why Kamala Harris lost: A flawed candidate or doomed campaign?"

Oct. 31, 2024 "Some voters aren't crazy about Trump. But they're supporting him anyway": Today I found this article by Rhianna Schmunk on CBC:


The side of the Carney family fridge is covered in the collage you'd expect in a home with two adults, six children, one husky and one black Labrador: school photos, sports schedules, a phone number for the vet and a magnet honouring the household super mom. 

The front lawn, on the other hand, has an unusual combination for a Michigan suburb with deep blue-collar roots: one sign declaring a "proud union home" and another backing "Trump Vance 2024."

After voting Democratic in the last two U.S. elections, the Carneys have flipped to supporting Republican nominee Donald Trump this year 

— not necessarily because they like Trump, the person, 

but because they're struggling with the cost of living.

"Everything's going sky-high.... It makes me realize how much Trump did for us when he was here, compared to when Biden came in," said Lindsy Carney, 36, a stay-at-home mom married to a tile worker in Warren, Mich., a small city just north of Detroit.

"But, like, some of the stuff he views and he says, I'm like … eh," she added, trailing off and wrinkling her nose.


The affordability factor

Americans who vote for Trump are often portrayed as deeply loyal supporters whose feelings won't be swayed by impeachmentsindictmentsa felony conviction or just about anything he says or does. 

However, there are voters in U.S. like Carney, who don't necessarily like him, but say they'll be voting for him anyway because 

they believe he's stronger on the economy 

and believe he'll make changes that will directly affect their lives.

"There are maybe three groups of voters out there," said Dave Dulio, distinguished professor of political science at Michigan's Oakland University. 

"One group, they've made up their mind about Trump — they hate him and that's it. 

There's another group that is willing to look past his character issues or past statements … and they're voting for him no matter what.

"And then there's that other group that doesn't like him, but is going to hold their nose and vote for him."

Throughout the campaign, the Republican Party has painted President Joe Biden as responsible for the high price of goods.

Inflation soared around the world in 2021 and 2022 as economies around the world bounced back from a pandemic recession. 

Some analysts warned the Biden administration's pandemic-relief spending in 2021 might have contributed, but it was just one of several nuanced factors.

The non-partisan Congressional Budget Office cited four key players

the pandemic's supply-chain disruptions, 

low unemployment, 

fiscal policy 

and Russia's invasion of Ukraine.

Inflation in the United States has since cooled, but the price of food, rent and utilities continues to be a sticking point for voters.

For people like Carney, the complex reasons why prices soared after the pandemic aren't important. 

She believes Trump will do a better job at improving her family's economic situation because inflation, 

she reasons, was lower when he was in office between 2016 and 2020 — a common rationale among voters who spoke with CBC News.

"It's groceries. It's gas. It's just every cost of living right now," said Carney, adding salt to a pot of boiling water on the stove. "We're always behind a bill somehow."

Voters in the seven battleground states that will determine the winner of the election on Nov. 5 have a negative view of the economy, according to a Reuters/Ipsos poll done this month.

More than 60 per cent said the economy is on the wrong track and 68 per cent say the same for the cost of living.

CBC News spoke with more than a dozen voters in four different Michigan communities about the issues most important to them this election. Every one said the cost of living was a concern — ranging from an inconvenience to a crisis.

Several spoke on background, but asked not to be named or photographed with their faces showing because they were concerned about what Democratic neighbours, loved ones and colleagues might think of their vote for Trump.


Promised solutions from presidential hopefuls

About 50 kilometres west of Detroit lies the township of Canton, another suburb. As property manager Jim Alcorn tucked into a leafy Michigan salad at a Leo's Coney Island restaurant, he noted that he, too, believes life was more affordable under Trump.

"I'm voting for Trump because I like his policies and I think he's a good businessman," said Alcorn, 69.

"Trump, the person," he continued, taking a long wincing pause. 

"He's OK. 

I don't like a lot of things he does. 

And I don't like … he talks about people in a personal sense. 

I don't like all that stuff. 

It should be kept to politics."

Democratic nominee Kamala Harris and Trump have promised different solutions to the economy. 

Harris has said she'll fight price gouging 

and increase a child tax credit,

while Trump has proposed cutting taxes on overtime pay, 

imposing blanket tariffs on imports that he says will bring manufacturing back to the U.S., 

and mass deportation of immigrants.

Harris's price-gouging ban is untested on a federal level, 

and economists say Trump's proposed tariffs and deportation threats will drive up prices for goods and services.

Some voters said they didn't need specifics because they think Trump is business-savvy.

"I think I'm going to vote for Trump, honestly, because the economy was better, the country was safer when he was our president," said Andrew Youkhana, 25, whose family owns several local Tim Hortons locations in Michigan.

"I know he's not a perfect person. Some things he says are not — a lot of people don't like what he says, but at least he's a businessman," he said. 

"And I really feel like he is going to put American people first compared to the other side."

Sherry Tubbs, 55, said she never used to vote regularly because she didn't care for the political circus — "I went to work, paid my taxes and didn't complain" — but will be supporting Trump this year because she's fed up with the high cost of living.

"I'm not happy with it. Nobody's happy with it. I have to decide: Get your car fixed this week or buy food," said Tubbs, ashing her cigarette outside the home that she and her son could only afford by buying it together.

"I was happy [when Trump was president]. I want that back."

The antagonistic U.S. election has seen the candidates campaign on pressing issues like 

abortion

climate

immigration

foreign policy 

and the sanctity of American democracy.

 Those are important to voters, Dulio said, but financial trouble is particularly motivating.

"Those daily-experience issues of going to the grocery store, going to the gas pump, trying to make ends meet — I think that that has major impact on people," said Dulio.

"Even some folks who have soft support for Kamala Harris and Tim Walz may find themselves saying to themselves, 'Hey, look, I don't necessarily want to support Donald Trump, but the economy's not great right now and it was better when he was president.'"

Such voter behaviour could repeat itself in the Canadian federal election, with people voting for the party of a candidate they might not like personally because they're unhappy with affordability under Prime Minister Justin Trudeau. 


Food on the table over good character

Laura Stephenson, a political science professor at Western University in London, Ont., said voters who can't afford to put food on the table will care less about a candidate's character if they believe they're going to help.

"A lot of what you care about is not whether you get to hang out with them and shake their hand ... but instead whether or not they're going to enact policies that actually benefit you," she said.

For years, Michigan's unemployment rate has been consistently higher than the overall U.S. number. Last year, the state hit its highest job level and lowest unemployment in two decades.

Polls suggest Harris has a slim lead over Trump nationwide, but battleground states are still anybody's game. 

For the Carneys, their swing vote was motivated by one singular issue.

"We are always kind of liberal, [but] we kind of just see who's there," said Carney, leaning back against her grey countertops. "This year, our views just happened to go Republican."

https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/trump-voters-michigan-harris-presidential-election-1.7367116


Nov. 6, 2024 "Why Kamala Harris lost: A flawed candidate or doomed campaign?": Today I found this article by Courtney Subramanian on BBC News:

Nearly a month ago, Kamala Harris appeared on ABC's The View in what was expected to be a 

friendly interview aimed at pitching herself to Americans who wanted to know more about her.

But the sit-down was quickly overshadowed by her response to a question on what she would have 

done differently from incumbent president, Joe Biden: "Not a thing comes to mind."

Harris's answer - which became a Republican attack ad on loop - underscored the political 

headwinds that her jumpstart campaign failed to overcome in her decisive loss to Donald Trump

 on Tuesday.

Publicly, she conceded the race late on Wednesday afternoon, telling supporters "do not despair".

But soul-searching over where she went wrong and what else she could have done will likely take 

longer as Democrats begin finger-pointing and raising questions about the future of the party.


https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cjr4l5j2v9do


Nov. 6, 2024 My opinion: I was mildly disappointed that Trump won and will be the American president again.

All the people who voted for him, I hope Trump is able to help them and lower the cost of living.

I hope to see Kamala Harris run again to be a president.

I woke up in the middle of the night to use the washroom.  I was tempted to check to see who won, but I didn't.

If Trump won, I would be angry and in a bad mood, and I wouldn't be able to go to sleep.

If Harris won, I would be happy, and I wouldn't be able to go to sleep.

I'll wait until the morning until all the votes are counted.


I did my part by posting all the negative articles about Trump, and all the positive articles about Harris: 

Aug. 2024:


"Nashville quiet on the Trump conundrum"/ "Singers say they’re putting country above politics"

https://badcb.blogspot.com/2024/08/nashville-quiet-on-trump-conundrum.html


"Lana Condor Slams President Trump for Calling Coronavirus 'the Chinese Virus': 'How Dare You'"/ "Trump banned from Facebook’s networks for at least two years"





"A donor who gave $2.5 million to a pro-Trump group looking for election fraud wants his money back after disappointing results"/ "Trump Plaza renamed 'The Plaza' as condo owners pivot to original name of West Palm Beach complex"

https://badcb.blogspot.com/2024/08/a-donor-who-gave-25-million-to-pro.html


Sept. 2024:


"Harris Could Become First U.S. President to Have Worked at McDonald’s"/ "Harris Economic Proposals Envision Tax Cuts and Subsidies"





Oct. 2024:

"Kamala Harris and Nancy Pelosi: How America's most powerful women look to make history again"/ "Texas man pays $4,000 for ‘autographed’ Taylor Swift guitar at auction then smashes it to pieces with hammer"




"Donald Trump said disabled people should just die, his nephew says"/ "Second Trump presidency would put ‘meaningful drag’ on Canada’s economy: Desjardins"



"Obama tells men to drop ‘excuses’ and support Kamala Harris over Trump"/ "Michelle Obama Finally Takes the Mound Against Donald Trump"




Nov. 2024:


"Trump refers to CNN's Anderson Cooper by a woman's first name"/ "Scotiabank Economist Says Trump Win Would Bring ‘Ruinous’ Policy"




"'We must mobilize': Harris rallies with Beyoncé and Willie Nelson in Texas"/ "Sally Field Details Her ‘Traumatic’ and ‘Hideous’ Illegal Abortion From 1964 to Urge Voters to Elect Kamala Harris: ‘We Can’t Go Back’"




Nov. 8, 2024 Leo opinion:

Christine W, Redbridge, Ontario, would like to know:

How do you feel about the outcome of the 2024 United States presidential election?


Displeased 66. 82% (3266)


Neutral 20.79% (1016)


Pleased 12. 40% (606)


My opinion: I was displeased.



These are the other 2 blog posts:


"The Great Resignation isn't over yet: Workers say they'll quit if they don't get the flexibility they want"/ "Many bosses are spending almost half their day dealing with staff turnover, survey says"




"You've heard of quiet quitting. Here's how to tell if you're being quietly fired"/ "The quiet quitters are getting quiet fired: The silent war playing out in offices"





My week:



Nov. 4, 2024 🚃"'I married the train driver who saved my life'": Today I found this article by Corne Van Hoepen on Yahoo:

Warning: This article contains references to suicide and mental health issues.

On a summer afternoon in 2019, nurse Charlotte Lay got ready for her night shift as normal but "wasn't feeling quite right."

Within a short space of time she had decided to end her own life close to a railway station located in the U.K.

But thanks to the kindness of the train driver who found her in crisis, she did not go through with it.

Three years later they married each other and went on to have children.

"I'd struggled with my mental health since my teens and I'd been in and out of the system since," Charlotte, now 33, says in an interview with BBC News.

Her memories of that day five years ago are "quite blurry" but she says she remembers seeing a train pulling up on the tracks where she was, close to Crossflatts Station, near Bradford.

"I remember seeing a man getting off the train and starting to panic and thinking he was going to tell me off," she recalls.

"He approached me and said 'hi, my name is Dave, are you having a bad day?'

"I said ‘yeah, just a bit’. He went ‘OK’, we can sit and talk until it feels better."

The pair talked for half an hour, by which time Charlotte, though still distressed, agreed to get into the cab. She was taken to Skipton Station and left in the care of the police.

The following day, Charlotte was desperate to find the man who had been so kind to her and issued an appeal on a local Facebook group for anyone who worked for Northern who might be able to put her in touch.

"I’d have understood if he didn’t want to hear from me, but I just wanted to say ‘thank you’ for giving me the time and for treating me like I was human being," she says.

Her plea was successful and after Charlotte was given Dave's number by one of his colleagues who had seen the appeal, she sent him a text.

After Dave returned Charlotte's text telling her he was available whenever she needed to speak to someone, they began exchanging messages on a daily basis.

They then met for a coffee two months later and the rest was history.

In 2022, the couple, who live in nearby Wilsden, got married, with Charlotte 22 weeks pregnant.

The couple say they wanted to share their story in the hope that anyone who is struggling can know better times are around the corner.

"Life does get better," Charlotte, who is now a mum of three, says. "You just have to be here to see it."

Charlotte says that it is often too difficult for people who are struggling to "reach out" and ask for help, so suggests people around them "reach in" instead. She continues to receive ongoing support for her mental health.

She believes asking someone if they are OK more than once can help them open up.

"We owe it to each other to be checking in with people around us," she says.

https://ca.yahoo.com/news/finally-some-good-news-7-year-olds-nhl-halloween-costume-goes-viral-an-indigenous-language-first-woman-marries-train-driver-who-saved-her-life-184017543.html




Sat. Nov. 2, 2024 Cosmic Pizza and Donair: My mom and I had 2 big slices of pizza for $8.  I had a donair topping and mom had pepperoni.  They're very filling.  They're average.

Mom thought the crust was too thin.  She prefers Pizza 73.

I like the chicken mushroom melt from Pizza 73.

Sun. Nov. 3, 2024 Bonnie Doon mall: My friend Cham came by and I met her baby daughter.  My mom also met the baby too.

Cham has never been to this mall. 










"You've heard of quiet quitting. Here's how to tell if you're being quietly fired"/ "The quiet quitters are getting quiet fired: The silent war playing out in offices"

Oct. 8, 2022 "You've heard of quiet quitting. Here's how to tell if you're being quietly fired": Today I found this article by Brandie Weikle on CBC:


Looking back, says MaryAnn Kerr, it was a work call at home on a day off that heralded the beginning of the end of a job. 

About five years ago, Kerr, a veteran executive in the non-profit sector, landed a sweet gig as vice-president of a charity she loved. Roughly three or four months into it, her boss was calling her at home, angry about something seemingly innocuous Kerr had said during an earlier phone meeting.

"It was over something that made no sense at all…. They thought I was overstepping, that this was not appropriate for me to say."

That began what she describes as "a campaign to undermine" her by a CEO who seemed to believe Kerr was after their job.

"I was being excluded from meetings that I needed to attend in order to effectively do my job. 

Information was being withheld from me that I needed to do my job," Kerr told CBC Radio's The Cost of Living.

Much attention has been paid recently to the idea of "quiet quitting," when employees remain in their jobs but stick to the bare requirements of the role in order to avoid burnout.

A phenomenon called "quiet firing" can have the opposite effect — when employers subtly compel staff members to leave their jobs to avoid the messy business of firing them.

"I have heard the term quiet firing used in different countries or in different contexts, where … the employers make the workplace such a difficult environment that the employee feels that they have no choice but to leave," 

said Nita Chhinzer, associate professor of human resources at the University of Guelph's Gordon S. Lang School of Business and Economics. 

"So the employee may be overlooked for promotion, 

or their hours may be reduced, 

or they may suddenly no longer be scheduled." 


'A combination of being isolated and mobbed'

In Kerr's case, the boss would tell her that her colleagues didn't like her, 

and micromanage the way she handled her own direct reports. 

The boss would tell her to hold weekly meetings with her team, said Kerr, 

but also subvert her authority with them.

"And [the team] literally ignored my emails. They would not meet with me. So it's a combination of being isolated and mobbed, to a certain extent."

Other times, the CEO would be combative with her in front of others at meetings, said Kerr, "almost like a fighting match to kind of poke at me."

"I even had an episode at a public event where they shoved me out of the way to get to a photo opportunity."

Kerr's experience tracks with other cases like it, said Chhinzer. It's fairly common in cases like this for the boss to make the employee in question an "outgroup member."

"So they don't get invited to meetings, they don't get invited to the lunches," said Chhinzer. 

"When there's developmental opportunities, they get overlooked for those."

Workers can be even more vulnerable to quiet firing outside of office jobs.

"In some of the high-turnover industries, like 

restaurants, 

grocery stores 

and retail, 

there's a very high likelihood that people just simply get scheduled out 

or they have their hours reduced," said Chhinzer.


More vulnerable workers less likely to sue

When workers don't have guaranteed hours, it makes them much more vulnerable to quiet firing, she said.

"Without a guaranteed number of hours, these people are often just put on minimal shifts, 

so they're forced to find a secondary form of employment in order to actually sustain themselves." 

These kinds of cases can fall under what's known under Canadian employment law as constructive dismissal — giving workers grounds to seek financial compensation for being pushed out of their jobs. 

But people who work in grocery stores, for example, are not likely to have the financial resources to take legal action against their employer, said Chhinzer.

Determining whether your case of quiet firing would be considered constructive dismissal under the law comes down to a couple of key distinctions, said employment lawyer Hermie Abraham, who runs a Toronto firm called Advocation Employment Law.

"Quiet firing can kind of fall into two buckets. 

There could be the quiet firing where the employer is just disengaged with an employee," 

said Abraham, who became a lawyer after an earlier career in human resources.

This type of quiet firing may not be legally actionable as a dismissal, she said, "but the employee is sort of being put out to pasture. [The employer is] not investing in them."

The other type is when employers purposely do things to push somebody out — such as 

changing compensation 

or demoting them from manager to individual contributor. 

"In law, that's considered constructive dismissal, and there are remedies for the employee," Abraham said.

Take the example of somebody who is working in a restaurant. 

"Let's say somebody was working a shift that was a really good shift, and they're getting lots of tips," said Abraham. 

"All of a sudden, now they're being moved to a time where maybe they're getting the same hours, but they're not getting the same tips — that could [fall into the] category of constructive dismissal, 

because of the fact that there's a fundamental change to a key part of their employment, which is their remuneration."


Getting help

MaryAnn Kerr was eventually let go, and can't discuss the terms of her departure. But she has advice for those who find themselves in a similar situation.

"I think it's important to talk to HR, because that's about protecting yourself," she said.

 Same with keeping notes — Kerr said detailed journals proved useful in her case.

"And then it's important to talk to a trusted adviser outside of the organization. 

Tell them what's happening and ask them what they think."

If workers think they have a legal case, Abraham says they should seek the advice of an employment lawyer. 

If a case is the more subtle kind, where they're being overlooked for opportunity, she suggests writing to the boss.

An employee can outline the factors that have been getting in the way of their success at work, and suggest some solutions, says Abraham.

"Just sort of languishing and being miserable at work, it's not a thing to do," she said.

 "Life is way too short to do that."

You've heard of quiet quitting. Here's how to tell if you're being quietly fired | CBC Radio


Oct. 25, 2022 "The quiet quitters are getting quiet fired: The silent war playing out in offices": Today I found this article by Victoria Wells on the Financial Post:


You’ve probably heard of quiet quitting, in which workers refuse to do much more than meet the expectations laid out in their job descriptions. That sounds reasonable enough to most employees — and many have argued the term simply means doing your job — but bosses haven’t been too pleased about it.

Managers are agonizing over what an office full of quiet quitters means for productivity, and for some that’s translated into taking on a portion of their employees’ workloads to make up the loss. 

Four out of 10 managers in Toronto say they’re putting in extra time and effort because staff under the age of 30 are doing less, according to a recent poll conducted by recruiter Robert Walters Canada.

The young professionals pulling back at work say it’s mostly because they aren’t paid enough.

As high inflation and the rising cost of living take a bite out of paycheques, many employees assume their employers can and should make up the difference with a hefty raise. 

But that’s just a pipe dream. Most companies would find it impossible to match the rate of inflation, which came in at 6.9 per cent in September, with wage hikes.

As a result, we’re witnessing a silent war play out between employees and their managers, some of whom are fighting back in their own passive-aggressive way by “quiet firing” the quiet quitters.

Quiet firing subtly freezes out an employee by either 

avoiding one-on-one conversations, 

refusing to provide feedback, 

neglecting to share critical information needed to do a job, 

passing them over for a promotion 

or subjecting them to stingy raises

 — or no raise at all —

while co-workers are awarded more.

That may sound pretty extreme, but the practice appears to be more common than you’d think. Most workers say they’ve either experienced it or seen it play out in their workplace, says a recent poll by LinkedIn News

Meanwhile, one in three managers in the United States say they’ve actually gone the “quiet firing” route, according to a poll by Resumebuilder.com.

The effect can be demoralizing for an employee, which is exactly the point. 

“Eventually, you’ll either feel so 

incompetent, 

isolated 

and unappreciated 

that you’ll go find a new job,

and they never have to deal with a development plan 

or offer severance,” 

says Bonnie Dilper, a recruiter for work software company Zapier Inc., in a LinkedIn post.

Even if quiet quitters aren’t on the quiet firing line, they are more likely to end up on the chopping block anyway. 

Three-quarters of managers think it’s OK to fire staffers who aren’t putting their all into their jobs, Resumebuilder.com’s poll says. 

Workers putting in the bare minimum might want to take that to heart if they plan on keeping their jobs through a recession and possible layoffs. 

“(Quiet quitting) will simply make it easier to determine whose head is going to roll,” warn employment lawyers Howard Levitt and Peter Carey.

This “quiet” war could be a direct consequence of working from home. 

Remote work seems to have broken something fundamental in the employee-employer relationship: good communication. 

A large swathe of the workforce appears to have forgotten how to speak to one another, and even approaching a co-worker for a quick conversation during in-office days has become frowned upon. 

There’s another buzzword for that: “desk bombing.” For some, getting unexpectedly greeted by a colleague has become as anxiety-ridden as having to talk to someone by phone.

Meanwhile, managers say remote and hybrid work has made it very easy for employees to fly under the radar, 

and working from home is a “breeding ground” for quiet quitters, according to Robert Walters Canada. 

But the recruiter says the solution is simple enough: bring people back into the office more often.

“If quiet quitters are benefiting from being ‘out of sight, out of mind,’ then employers should not hesitate to make more office face-time mandatory,” Martin Fox, managing director at Robert Walters Canada, says in a news release.

Employees continue to push back on being in the office more often, but the extra face-to-face communication time could help smooth out the expectations of both employers and employees as far as work effort goes. 

And then the quiet quitters won’t have to worry about being quiet fired.

• Email: vwells@postmedia.com | Twitter: 

Quiet quitters are getting quiet fired in silent workplace war | Financial Post


There are 97 comments.

While this is an older article now there is an interesting phenomenon occurring in the job markets, at least in Ottawa. Many companies, particularly American, have been poaching Ottawa tech employees singing the praises of flex work from home. Now that the economy is showing signs of strain these people are getting their pink slips as they were never really part of the new company -- more like a remote freelancer. My company lost 4 S/W developers to these US-based companies with the big promises. As of today 3 of the 4 have been laid off by their new distant employers.