Tuesday, August 29, 2017

"In producing Legion, ideas run free"/ Riverdale

Jan. 17, 2017 "In producing Legion, ideas run free": Today I found this article by Ian Bailey in the Globe and Mail:


Michael Wylie is in production designers’ heaven. As he leads reporters on a tour of sets he designed and had built for the new TV series Legion, he says he has been given a freer-than-usual hand to let his imagination run wild.

He has unleashed his imagination into a pretty big playground.

Sets for the series, based on the X-Men-related character, were built in a 160,000-square-foot former supermarket warehouse in this city southeast of Vancouver. It feels as large as a pair of downtown Vancouver city blocks. Throughout the tour, there’s the strident ringing of bells to indicate that cameras are rolling elsewhere in the vast space where shadows are broken here and there by lights for filming.


“A lot of times in TV shows, things have to be in continuity. From episode to episode, things have to be in continuity. There’s more flexibility to Legion,” says Wylie, who has designed sets for such series as Masters of Sex and the recent similarly Marvel comics-inspired Agent Carter.

The freedom is notable on Legion because the series is based on the realm of the X-Men – the righteous, heroic mutants featured in six films since Bryan Singer’s X-Men in 2000. There’s been a largely consistent look to the characters and settings since then.

But that all appears to have been enthusiastically chucked out the window with Legion, which will run eight episodes in its first season on on cable channel FX in Canada and the U.S. The series was created by Noah Hawley, the American novelist and screenwriter who has been acclaimed for his lively TV adaptation of Fargo, based on the 1996 Coen brothers’ movie about nefarious doings in Minnesota.

“I think the nature of this story and this story world is that it’s not as beholden to a certain aesthetic as some superhero stars are, in that sense,” says a chipper Dan Stevens, who played ill-fated Matthew Crawley in the British series Downton Abbey.

In Legion, Stevens is playing David Haller – a.k.a. Legion. In the comics, Legion was a mutant with dissociative personality disorder whose personas each had access to individual superpowers such as telepathy, telekinesis and pyrokinesis. He was also the son of X-Men leader Professor X – a.k.a. Charles Xavier.

But there was no talk of any such links during the media tour held in the fall as work was under way on the seventh of Legion’s eight episodes. “I don’t know who Professor X is,” actress Jean Smart, who co-stars in Legion as a mutant therapist, said politely during an interview.

And Stevens himself said Legion won’t exactly be like X-Men films. “It doesn’t feel like a superhero show. None of us yet have capes or horns or anything quite like that,” Stevens told reporters during a break from filming.

The series does not take place in any fixed time. Cars from the sixties exist with modern-day cars. Clothing is a mishmash of present-day and past fashions. As one cast member notes, it’s a kind of “sixties, mod-Britannia realm.” It’s the future as imagined from the perspective of the 1960s and 1970s. Another cast member says the proceedings have the visual tone Stanley Kubrick created for his feature films A Clockwork Orange and 2001: A Space Odyssey.

“We’re just trying to confound everybody,” says a bemused Wylie.

In a conference call with reporters, Hawley said he had read X-Men comics, but was not interested in a straightforward adaptation of that material. “There was no rulebook or anything I was handed when I came on.”

He also said he was steering clear of the angle around specific powers being linked to varied personalities created by Legion’s multiple personality disorder. Rather, he said, he was intrigued with the premise of someone who has to reassess their assumptions about themselves.

“What we get into with David is this idea that he has lived for 30 years and this identity he believes in is actually fake. Maybe he doesn’t have mental illness. Maybe he has these abilities. If that’s so, he has to go back and rewrite the story of himself. That, to me, was a fascinating existential journey that I wanted to take.”

Hawley said he approached the material in the same way he approached Fargo, where the mandate was to adapt the film about homicides linked to a nefarious kidnapping plot in Minnesota for TV without using its specific story.

“[It] was a very odd thing to think about, which is: How do you take the essence of a story and translate it into a completely new story,” he recalled. “But it liberated me in a lot of ways to create something where I wasn’t imitating. I wasn’t taking pieces that [filmmakers Joel and Ethan Coen] had created and sort of mimicking them.”

With Legion, he says he, similarly, wasn’t interested in adapting specific issues of X-Men comics, though he was inspired by the material. “As I looked at it, the character led me to the story, which led me to the style and so, in many ways, if you’re going to watch the show looking for story lines that you recognize, that wasn’t my intention. My hope is to create something unexpected.”

He says Marvel has been supportive. “I am not sure they knew what to make of this as I came to them with this out-there idea for a show. It doesn’t really fit into all of the other shows they’re doing and I think that’s exciting for them in that they get to just give me the rope for me to run or hang myself or whatever I am going to do with it.”

Cast members and production staff promise drama, complicated relationships, action and mutants. Beyond that, details are limited, and some that were fairly obvious during the sound stage visit cannot be revealed without spoiling the show.

The X-Men films, which made Australian actor Hugh Jackman – a.k.a. Wolverine – a star are old news on the big screen. And there have been X-Men cartoons. But live-action TV is a new frontier for the franchise. Various X-Men-related TV series were on the drawing board, but Hawley won the race to get one to the sound stage.

Smart, nominated for an Emmy for her work on Fargo, says she knew nothing about comic-book superheroes, but signed on quickly when asked to join Legion. “Noah asked and I said yes. It didn’t matter what it was about. I kind of came into it blind,” said Smart, well known for her work in the sitcom Designing Women, and for playing a troubled U.S. first lady in 24.

Hawley has laid out a creative mandate for his team, says Wylie. It is this: “This story is being told from an unreliable narrator so we can do whatever we want, so that’s a really fun part of doing the show,” says the production designer.

“What that means to us, is ‘Everything goes.’”

So Wylie’s sets include the slickly furnished interior of a giant ice cube that’s the brain of one mutant – though Hawley apparently prefers to refer to “people with abilities.” Elsewhere, there’s David Haller’s apartment, which seems both modern and vintage – as confused as the character.

And there are the corridors and vast day room for the Clockworks Mental Hospital – a 23,000-square-foot set. This was the most complicated set to develop, he says. “Trying to make a hospital feel fun is a perfect challenge.”

Asked about shooting in the city, Hawley wryly said, “I heard all television shows are shot in Vancouver. That’s why we went up there. But, no – Vancouver offers an amazing array of looks and feels and, obviously, a great crew base and everything. We were thrilled to be up there.”

Hawley’s Fargo TV series has been shot in Calgary and other parts of Alberta.
Wylie was inspired by the brutalist architecture of the 1950s to mid-1970s, which often features bulk and exposed concrete and is typically seen in government and institutional buildings. “We shot all the exteriors at UBC where they have a lot of that sixties and seventies brutalist architecture and kind of embraced it,” explained Wylie.

But while there will be streaks of the traditional X-Men films in the DNA of Legion, Wylie notes that some props from the feature films have been brought to this sound stage from storage in Montreal – where the last two X films were shot – and the United States.
He did not say how they would be used, but, as with everything else, he has a free hand.

“You don’t have to follow any rules. If you come up with something, you can do something because you think it’s cool, or that it’s pretty or it manipulates somebody,” he said, then added with a smile, “We’re in the manipulation business here.”

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/arts/television/why-the-production-designer-for-the-new-tv-series-legion-has-a-dream-job/article33635015/

My opinion: I have never seen the show before, but I would like to check out the pilot.


Jan. 11, 2017 "Riverdale is a subversive, dark take on Archie Comics universe": Today I found this article by John Doyle in the Globe and Mail:


It’s hovering around 9 a.m. on Sunday. I’m in a room with a couple of hundred people who write about television. A man on the stage is jawing on about the importance of keeping critically acclaimed but low-rated series on the air. It makes sense, he says, because the acclaim eventually draws in viewers who might watch others shows.

The man is Mark Pedowitz, president of the small, feisty CW network. The CW has such long-running series as Supernatural and in recent years delivered the strange but wonderful Crazy Ex-Girlfriend and Jane the Virgin.

Yes, I’m at the midseason press tour for TV critics. It goes 14 days, every day, almost 24/7 and I’m here for a few days of it.

Pedowitz started by saying, “I’m not competing this morning, thank God, with any presidential-elect tweet. So things are good there.” This brings a laugh. Getting attention for any new TV production is difficult enough in an era of 450 scripted series airing across all platforms in the TV universe.

But there’s another side to the remark – one of the reasons for coming here is figuring out how U.S. TV will respond to the species of populism illustrated in Donald Trump’s victory. Is TV on board or acting as part of the resistance?

Television takes time to create and produce, but at any time it certainly acts as a reflection, sometimes twisted, of what the public is feeling.

Riverdale, a CW show that arrives on Jan. 26 (in Canada on Netflix), has been in development for a couple of years, first at Fox and now landing on the feisty CW. How it illustrates what’s happening in the United States is open to interpretation. Certainly, though, it is the first talked-about and advance-acclaimed new drama of 2017.

It falls into the category of “Is nothing sacred?” See, it is based on the characters in the Archie Comics, but bizarrely, shockingly so. Pedowitz called it “The O.C. meets Twin Peaks.” And that isn’t the half of it. It’s not a high-school show. It’s startlingly adult, subversive and near-Gothic. It’s sexy, funny and very creepy. It is, frankly, an amazingly ambitious, daring drama.

Anyone who thought that the wholesome quality of the narrative of Archie, Betty, Veronica and Jughead might simply make for a new 90210 for this decade was wrong. There’s a scene in the first episode in which Betty (Lili Reinhart) asks Archie (K.J. Apa) if he has feelings for her.

Archie hesitates and the viewer knows why. It’s because he is having, but can’t explain, a passionate fling with Miss Grundy (Sarah Habel). In Riverdale, Miss Grundy is not the white-haired schoolteacher of the comics. She’s a siren of a music teacher quite ready to indulge in an intense sexual affair with a student.

As for the classic love triangle of Archie, Betty and Veronica (Camila Mendes), it certainly exists, but this Veronica is more like the sultry brunette vixen from an imagined pornographic twist on the Archie Comics. Watch the first hour and you’re ready to believe that the dynamic between the trio is highly erotic and a threesome is on the cards.

Especially after Veronica and Betty indulge in a passionate kiss in their cheerleader uniforms. I swear I’m not making this up.

Once the shock wears off, the bones of Riverdale become clear. It’s a tangled murder-mystery set in a small town where evil lurks. What happens is that Cheryl Blossom (Madelaine Petsch, who is wonderful as the school’s main mean girl and dangerous she-devil) and twin brother Jason are boating out on the lake. Jason drowns. Accident?

Obviously not, in this world where everybody is hiding something. Most characters barely pretend to be wholesome. Me, I’m no expert on the Archie Comics universe, but I know enough to recognize that this is the Archie universe on acid.

There is a remarkably textured, blurry twist on the retro-vibe. The reference to Twin Peaks – which, interestingly also returns, rebooted, this year – is supported not just by the tone but by the casting of Madchen Amick, who was the abused waitress Shelly Johnson on Twin Peaks, as Betty’s mom. This mom is, mind you, closer to the crazed mother of Carrie, Margaret White, in Stephen King’s story, than to Betty’s mom in the comics.

And then there’s the nod to Beverly Hills 90210, with the casting of Luke Perry as Archie’s dad. This show is a very heady concoction. As one critic put it to the Riverdale cast and creators here, it’s like Happy Days was rebooted and Fonzie was actually a dangerous gang member.

Asked if he’s anticipating a backlash against this perverse twist on the old, familiar comics, CEO and publisher of Archie Comics, Jon Goldwater, was amused. “Backlash is good,” he said. “I don’t think there’s going to be anything but a great backlash.”

Admittedly, the Archie Comics line was relaunched a few years ago with more mature themes and there was the novelty of a comic featuring Archie fighting zombies in Riverdale.

But for most Americans, Archie Comics and its iconic characters are apple-pie wholesome.
The tale of how Riverdale came into being is a tangled one and offers an insight into the sheer weirdness of the TV business here.

When the series was in development, executive producer Roberto Aguirre-Sacasa says there were mind-boggling suggestions from one unnamed executive. “He said, ‘I want you to think about time travel, Archie travelling through time,’ ” Aguirre-Sacasa told us. Then came another suggestion: “Portals are huge,” this exec said. “A portal to another dimension [for Archie]” And then came the wildest idea: “What if Louis C.K. is Archie?” Aguirre-Sacasa described the situation as, “Like something out of an episode of Entourage.”

The show’s creative team then settled on what they truly wanted, a surreal, noir-ish Archie Comics. “It became a loss-of-innocence show,” Aguirre-Sacasa explained.

This Riverdale revels in irony, perversity and ambiguity. It has the look of a drama set in the recent past – that period to which Donald Trump refers when he brays about making America great again – but it is emphatically set in the present. A present in which Veronica can be designated as looking like Betty Draper in a certain season of Mad Men. And a present in which the perceived serenity of the recent past is recast as a fraud, and then is remounted as a world utterly lacking in traditional morality.

Coming immediately after a topsy-turvy year, Riverdale feels like a gesture of disenchantment. In that itself, it’s popular culture with a Trump-ian twist – a complete loss of innocence, as its producer asserts.

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/arts/television/john-doyle-cws-riverdale-is-a-subversive-startling-take-on-archie-comics-universe/article33547832/

My opinion: When I first heard about this show, I was kind of "eh" with it.  As in I wasn't really that excited about it.  It was about teens and I have really stopped watching shows about them.  I have leaned to written action- dramas like Blindspot, Quantico, and Arrow.

I don't know if I could take the show seriously because I read these comics books in elementary school.  However, there was a murder mystery.  I decided I'll record all the episodes and watch it in a week.

It was pretty good.   There is a good mystery with surprises and turns in it. 

"CBC's Pure is not so simple"/ "Alberta actor makes name playing bad guy"

Jan. 16, 2017 "CBC's Pure is not so simple": Today I found this article by Melissa Hank in the Edmonton Journal:


When it comes to successful television shows, sometimes you just have to go for the WTF effect.

Breaking Bad: A high-school chemistry teacher learns he has cancer, and decides to make meth to pay for his treatments. WTF?

Game of Thrones: Families fight for control of mythical lands, with dragons and beheadings and incest galore. WTF?

And The Walking Dead: two words — zombie apocalypse. WTF?

All those shows are unmistakably distinct, and all widely successful. The new CBC series Pure is banking on that formula of uniqueness. Set in southern Ontario, it follows a pastor who tries to bring down the Mennonite mob by working for them while feeding the cops intel on their drug-trafficking operations.

“The show revels in its specificity, in terms of community and where it’s set. If one looks beyond our shores to see which shows have been successful — internationally, at least on the cable front — every one of them has that in common,” says director Ken Girotti.

“Pure is a show that doesn’t try to water itself down to appeal to a broad audience. It just is what it is.”

Creator and writer Michael Amo, who also co-created homegrown drama The Listener, didn’t have to look far to find his concept.

“The inspiration was my grandparents. They were Mennonites from Russia who came to Canada, and I was always interested in that aspect of my family,” he says. “Then I came across stories about the Mennonite mob, I thought it was a fabulous way into that community.”

Though Amo had done plenty of research on Mennonites in Canada, and employed consultants to help with the language and performances on the show, he acknowledges that there’s a risk of Pure offending its subjects.  

“I want to emphasize that the people who are involved with (drug trafficking) are a very small minority in the Mennonite population,” he says. “Our main characters are trying to get rid of this problem as opposed to embracing it, so I hope there’s no backlash.”

With just six episodes in its first season, Pure already has had enough challenges — including making Nova Scotia stand in for southern Ontario, and portraying two high-contrast worlds for viewers.

“The Mennonite world is very spare and sparse and austere, and if you put that up against what the Mennonites call the Ausländer world, the outside world where we live, the Ausländer world is full of eye candy and confusing and messy and dirty and thick with information. So I used that kind of palette to inform how we shot the show” says Girotti, who also directs History’s action-packed period drama Vikings.

“Part of the story also takes place in Texas and Mexico, and those were challenging things to achieve, but I think we did pretty well.”

The solid cast helped — Girotti had worked with many of the stars on previous projects. Ryan Robbins plays pastor Noah Funk, with Alex Paxton-Beesley as his wife Anna, and A.J. Buckley, Peter Outerbridge and Rosie Perez round out the cast.

And, says Amo, there’s a sense of universality in Pure that he thinks will resonate with viewers. Shows dealing in spiritual and ethical matters have recently manifested onto TV screens.

On Fox, Lucifer focuses on the Devil, who leaves hell to run a nightclub in Los Angeles and help police catch criminals. NBC has The Good Place, about a woman of questionable morality who’s accidentally placed in a blissful afterlife. Comedy airs Impastor, about a fugitive who steals the identity of a deceased gay Lutheran pastor.

Plus there’s Preacher on AMC, following a spiritual leader who enlists the a vampire to help him find God, and Jane Lynch’s one season wonder Angel from Hell, which centred on an unconventional angel who connects with the human she’s charged with.

“I think there’s always an appetite for shows that approach our spiritual struggles in an honest and entertaining way,” says Amo.

“You might not see as many of them as other types of shows, but I think it’s part of the human condition to have these spiritual questions and longings. I think if they’re done in the right way, I think there’s always an audience for them.”

http://www.canada.com/entertainment/pure+banks+unique+premise+mennonite/12702674/story.html


"Alberta actor making name as a bad guy": Today I found this article by Eric Volmers in the Edmonton Journal:


Chad Rook goes through the same routine every time he receives a new script for the television series Timeless.

He races to the end to make sure he isn’t dead.

Such is life when you play a time-travelling villainous henchman. 

“Do I live? Do I still breathe by the end of this episode?” says Rook with a laugh, in a phone interview from Vancouver. “The longevity of the show, we’re pretty confident about that. But being a bad guy and one of the main henchman, it’s always just a throw of the dice every episode.”

The Lethbridge native plays Karl, the muscle behind chief antagonist Garcia Flynn (Goran Višnjić) in NBC’s high-concept sci-fi series. 


As such, he helps his ruthless boss travel through time in an attempt to change the course of American history. Abigail Spencer, Matt Lanter and Malcolm Barrett play, respectively, the history professor, soldier and engineer who are out to stop them.

Rook once described his character as “the guy who does all the killing and the shooting.” And, in the first few episodes, he didn’t do much else. But as the show developed, so has Karl.

“The more and more in-depth that Goran’s character got, the more Karl was included and the network started developing that character a lot,” says Rook. “When I first came on as Karl, it was just a smaller henchman role and it’s just gotten bigger and bigger and Karl has become more focused in regards to (plot.)”

When Timeless returns on Monday after a month-long hiatus, the mysterious motives behind Flynn’s campaign will begin to crystallize, which will further deepen Rook’s character. The storyline is set to “come to a climax ” and might change viewers’ opinions on notions of good and bad in the Timeless universe, Rook says.

Not that Rook minds being bad. For an actor who boasts such leading-man good looks, the 34-year-old has played plenty of heavies in his career. He left for Vancouver after graduating from Picture Butte high school, where he performed in school musicals.

Initially, Rook found success as the face of international modelling campaigns. But he soon began landing roles in TV series in Vancouver, including a recurring spot on the CW’s short-lived horror-thriller Cult. He got a major break as a super villain in The Flash, playing Clyde Mardon, a.k.a. The Weather Wizard, for a couple of episodes in 2014. In fact, throughout his career he has played a rogues gallery of arrogant vampires, con men, demons, kidnappers and killers.

“The villains always get to shoot the coolest guns and drive the coolest cars,” he says.
Whether his upcoming role in the mega-budgeted War For the Planet of the Apes is officially a villain is not clear at this point, but Rook does play a human soldier who serves under the film’s primary antagonist, The Colonel (played by Woody Harrelson.) Rook plays Boyle and Gabriel Chavarria plays Preacher, the Colonel’s two right-hand men.

“There’s a big difference between the two characters in regards to Preacher and Boyle,” Rook says. “There’s an antagonist, protagonist side to things, even though we’re both on the same side. ”

At the same time, Rook continues to make his own films. Frustrated at the sort of roles he was, or wasn’t, landing earlier in his career, he founded the independent production company back in 2009. He makes his feature debut as a writer-director-star in The Perfect Pickup, an upcoming romantic comedy about a group of four friends who set out to determine the perfect way to pick up women.

He plans to follow that directing and starring in a holiday movie called Christmisfits and with a post-apocalyptic sci-fi web series called A.R.I.D., in which he will play an convict who realizes most of the world population has been decimated.

As for Timeless, NBC has not announced whether it will renew the series. But Rook is confident and looks forward to more history-related adventures. That is if Karl survives the first season. So far, viewers have watched Flynn and Karl attempt to disrupt major moments in U.S. history, whether it be Watergate, the Hindenburg disaster, the assassination of Abraham Lincoln, the Apollo 11 mission and even The French and Indian War in 1754.

“It’s not only a period piece, it’s every period piece,” Rook says. “Every episode is something different that I don’t usually get to do. I play a lot of villains, but usually it’s always modern day. I was completely excited because I had never done a period piece and now I get to do every single one.

Not only that, when I first started watching the show it hit me that this is different because you are learning things. I didn’t know the full details of Lincoln’s assassination. I didn’t know the full details of Watergate. It’s based on reality. To be on set and see characters that look like Lincoln and Houdini and Bonnie and Clyde. That adds to the cool factor.”

http://calgaryherald.com/entertainment/television/good-at-bad-lethbridge-native-chad-rook-enjoying-timeless-role-as-violent-henchman

My opinion: I like the TV show Timeless.  I watched the pilot and thought it was good, and decided to watch the 2nd episode to determine if I should record every episode.  The 2nd episode was good too and I recorded the whole series.

It's a fun action show and you do learn history.

"Down for the count"/ "Bisexuality depicted as moral fluidity"

Nov. 29, 2016 "Down for the count": Today I found this article by Stephanie Merry in the Edmonton Journal:



“Bleed for This” is the second of three boxing biopics this year — and the second to bomb. “Hands of Stone” has brought in less than $5 million since its August release, and “Bleed,” which debuted Friday, opened with $2.6 million. That doesn’t bode well for “The Bleeder,” which premiered at the Venice Film Festival in September but does not yet have a wide-release date. Despite solid reviews for Liev Schreiber’s star turn, will people pay to see another movie about a down-and-out prizefighter searching for redemption?

It’s a little strange how many boxing movies that studios continue to churn out. The top five most-lucrative of the bunch, adjusted for inflation, were all made before 1986. Sure, there have been a few hits along the way since: Most recently, “Creed” opened a year ago and turned out to be a huge moneymaker, but it was also a savvy play.

Not only was it part of the successful “Rocky” franchise, but the fact that the movie starred Michael B. Jordan gave the drama a younger and more diverse audience than another installment of Sylvester Stallone’s punching frozen meat would have. Not only was the movie very good — both rousing and poignant — but it hit a sweet spot of nostalgia and freshness that appealed to people who do not care about boxing.


For comparison’s sake, check out the box office take on “Southpaw,” Antoine Fuqua’s movie that debuted a few months earlier, which, despite the star power of Jake Gyllenhaal, landed $52 million domestically, less than half of what “Creed” brought in. “Southpaw” turned a profit, but it hardly left enough of an impression to get Gyllenhaal an Oscar nomination, which is the way the Weinstein Company was positioning it.

The problem with boxing movies is becoming more apparent the more we encounter them. The first is that the template is so tired. How many times have we seen the same training montage? The same Yoda-like mentor? The same trajectory of an underdog winning against all odds?

It was not that long ago that those tropes were enough, in movies like “Cinderella Man” in 2005 and “The Fighter” in 2010. There was also 2004’s “Million Dollar Baby,” though Clint Eastwood threw the audience a curveball at the end of that tearjerker, transforming the same old story into a masterpiece or schlock, depending on whom you ask.

By the time “Grudge Match” bombed in 2013, starring Stallone and Mr. “Raging Bull” himself, Robert De Niro, as long-time rivals, audiences could barely muster a yawn.

There was nothing new or exciting about “Bleed for This,” except perhaps for the movie’s lead, the young talent Miles Teller, in the role of real-life prizefighter Vinny Pazienza. The boxer’s story is certainly harrowing; he suffered through a nearly fatal car accident and a broken neck and still got back in the ring.

But is that really so different from Roberto Duran overcoming a demoralizing match against Sugar Ray Leonard in “Hands of Stone“? Or Billy Hope hitting rock bottom after the death of his wife in “Southpaw”?

You can sort of see why these movies get made. Some have a certain amount of pedigree. De Niro took on the de rigueur role of the sage trainer in “Hands of Stone,” and Martin Scorsese was an executive producer on “Bleed for This.” Maybe the involvement of big names makes the movies seem like a safe investment. Plus, sports movies tend to do well in general.

But boxing is trickier than a feel-good drama about football or baseball because it’s a sport that Americans simply are not that interested in anymore. As the New Yorker magazine’s Kelefa Sanneh noted, last weekend’s big fight between Andre Ward and Sergey Kovalev was the fight of the year — but casual fans probably had not heard of either contender.

We’re a long way from the era when a Cold War matchup would have gotten Americans invested in the outcome, and decades since so many American boxers, including Leonard and Mike Tyson or Evander Holyfield and George Foreman, were household names whose celebrity transcended the realm of sports.

The odds are stacked against boxing movies, but more keep materializing. Considering how difficult it is to finance a movie about women, or really anything aimed at a demographic beyond 25-year-old men, the insistence on the boxing drama must be discouraging for aspiring filmmakers looking to break the mold, and a slap in the face to movie-goers.

At least there is one bright spot. Audiences are punching back simply by not tuning in. The question is: When will studios notice?



My opinion: I really like this article because it was well-written and analytical.  Also I wrote The Vertex Fighter script so it was relevant to me.  My script was about MMA.


"Tedious TV trope: Bisexuality depicted as moral fluidity": Today I found this article by Zachary Zane in the Edmonton Journal:


In the season premiere of “American Horror Story: Hotel” Elizabeth’s (Lady Gaga) bisexuality is revealed when she and Donovan (Matt Bomer) seduce a heterosexual couple.

The steamy foursome quickly turns dark and gory; after the encounter, Elizabeth and Donovan slit the throats of their sexual partners, drinking their blood. Sleeping with both men and women to gain power, Elizabeth is depicted as the villain of the Hotel Cortez. She was duplicitous, selfish and evil. She also was bisexual. This is not a coincidence.

On television, the trope of the evil bisexual isn’t new. Last year, GLAAD’s annual report on the state of minorities revealed that bisexuals are often one-dimensional characters, typecast as villains. The report said bisexual characters are “depicted as untrustworthy,
prone to infidelity, and/or lacking a sense of morality.”


The 2016 edition of GLAAD’s report said this was “one trope specifically that GLAAD continued to see over and over again.”

Many bisexual TV characters lack a moral compass. They exploit their own sexuality as a means to get ahead. They’re also unabashedly shameless in their actions, never having an ounce of remorse. It is as if, for these fictional bisexual characters, sexual fluidity equals moral fluidity. In this regard, sexuality is not seen as an identity, but rather, as a personality trait.

This was true for other bisexual characters, including Felicity from Shonda Rhimes’s newest drama, “The Catch.” Felicity, a bisexual woman of color, was secretive and untruthful about sleeping with her female partner, Margot, and with Margot’s brother. When Margot discovered the truth, she confronted Felicity, shouting, “You slept with my brother!” Felicity, however, wasn’t shaken. She coolly responded, “I wasn’t aware we were exclusive,” apparently unable to see any reason Margot might be upset.

And of course, this was also true for President Frank Underwood, from “House of Cards.” Interestingly, Frank’s bisexuality doesn’t further the plot; it is not a defining aspect of Frank’s identity. The showrunner, Beau Willimon, rejected labeling Frank as bisexual, instead saying, “He’s a man with a large appetite, he’s a man who does not allow himself to be placed in any sort of milieu or with one definition.”

Frank’s bisexuality, therefore, is just one part of his overall lack of a moral code. He’s a man who has no problem murdering, bribing, betraying — and sleeping with anyone — to obtain power. It was as if his voracious thirst for power somehow related to his sexual fluidity.

There’s a dearth of bisexual representation in mainstream media. As of 2016, only 30 percent (83 of the 278) of recurring LGBT characters on scripted broadcast, cable and streaming programming are bisexual. Even though this is up 2 percentage points from last year, this proportion still underrepresents the bisexual community. Data from a 2013 Pew Research Center report reveal that bisexuals compose the majority of the LGBT community, at 40 percent.

When there are relatively few depictions of bisexuals, the representation and integrity of each bisexual character holds more weight. There are real consequences to depicting bisexuality as moral fluidity. It perpetuates negative stereotypes about bisexuals. It perpetuates the misconception that all bisexuals are cheaters, liars and are incapable of being monogamous.

This characterization reverberates well beyond TV: Depicting bisexuals as untrustworthy and unethical increases the stigma they already experience. Often, bisexuality is viewed as a pit stop on the way to being “full-blown gay,” especially for men.

As a result, bisexuals are more likely to remain closeted than gays and lesbians, and bi youths are less likely than lesbian and gay youths to feel there’s a supportive adult with whom they can talk.

Despite the inaccurate and immoral depictions of bisexuals this past year, there was one show that depicted bisexuality realistically and positively. Darryl Whitefeather (Pete Gardner), from CW’s musical comedy “Crazy Ex-Girlfriend,” came out in an informative song, “Getting Bi.”

In the song, Gardner’s character pushed back against the notions that bisexuals are actually closeted gay individuals, who are confused, indecisive and promiscuous. He sang: “Being bi does not imply you’re a player or a slut.” Not only was his bisexuality critical to his identity and growth as a character, it also had nothing to do with his morality. He was like any other good man, who also happened to be bisexual.


More show creators need to follow this example. Portray bisexuals as normal people — people you see in the grocery store — not just power-hungry, unethical, cheating liars. Sexual fluidity and moral fluidity are two entirely different things.



My opinion: That was a really good article.  I never thought about that, because I have never watched any of those shows listed in the article.


My week:

Aug. 25, 2017 Health food place: I did a job interview there last week.  I had passed my resume there a few weeks ago.

Pros:

1. It was close by.  2 buses that came frequently.

2. Pay was min. wage.   Some tips.

3. There were evening shifts but it was closed at 8pm, so it wasn't really late.

4. I can do the job.

Cons:

1. This is a mild con.  I didn't really like the food and it was 50% off.

My opinion: I would work there if I got hired.  I feel like I wouldn't really love working there.  

Pita place: I did a job interview there last week.  It was about the same area as the above restaurant.   I had passed my resume there a few weeks ago.  They put an ad up on the internet and I emailed them too.  Then I got an interview.

Pros:

1. It was close by.  2 buses that came frequently.

2. Pay was $12.50/hr.   Some tips.


3. The shifts were alright.


4. The food is good and 50% off.



Cons: 

None.

My opinion: I would work there if I got hired.  However, they seem to look for people with more flexibility like evenings and weekends.

Health food place #2: This is another location, but at a post secondary institution.  I did the interview earlier this week.

Pros:

1. It was close by.  It was  like a 30 something - minute bus ride.

2. The hours were mostly daytime.  When they close at 8:30pm which is not too late.

Cons:

1. This is a mild con.  I didn't really like the food and it was 50% off.

2. Also the tips we get, it's all put towards a staff party that happens twice a year where we get a free dinner at a restaurant.


My opinion: I would work there if I got hired.
 

Aug. 26, 2017 Bakery: I did an interview earlier this week.  The boss emailed me and I called him that day.  I went there in the afternoon.

Pros:

1. It was easy to get to.  One bus and a 30 something- minute ride.

2. The hours were daytime with set days.  I can schedule this job with the other one.

3. I can do the job.

Cons:

1. No tips.

2. No discount.  The bread that's not sold that day, is frozen.  I thought it would be free.  I would have to have pay full-price.

My opinion: I would work there if I got hired.

10 yr old boy saves his brother: I found this in the National Post in the Edmonton Journal

Jacob O’Connor saw his baby brother’s shoe floating in the pool first.
Then he saw his body.


It had been just a week since the 10-year-old Michigan boy last watched his favorite movie, “San Andreas,” an action drama that stars Dwayne “The Rock” Johnson rescuing his family from two hours of tragedy — an earthquake, a tsunami and, most relevant to Jacob, a near-drowning.


Johnson’s character pulls his unconscious daughter from floodwaters and gives her CPR, first in a collapsing building, then in a boat. Finally, she spits up water.

Jacob O’Connor saw his baby brother’s shoe floating in the pool first.
Then he saw his body.


It had been just a week since the 10-year-old Michigan boy last watched his favorite movie, “San Andreas,” an action drama that stars Dwayne “The Rock” Johnson rescuing his family from two hours of tragedy — an earthquake, a tsunami and, most relevant to Jacob, a near-drowning.


Johnson’s character pulls his unconscious daughter from floodwaters and gives her CPR, first in a collapsing building, then in a boat. Finally, she spits up water.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2017/08/25/how-a-boy-saved-his-drowning-brothers-life-with-help-from-the-rocks-san-andreas/?utm_term=.5954971ed275

Aug. 29, 2017: Last week was good because I worked 4 days, and 1 of them was at the 2nd job.  I also did 5 job interviews.

I also sat outside and read the newspaper over the weekend.


Tuesday, August 22, 2017

"Anticipating severance, I was offered a job"/ cannabis prescription

May 29, 2017 "Anticipating severance, I was offered a job. What do I do?": Today I found this article in the Globe and Mail:

THE QUESTION

I had been with my company almost 20 years when it was taken over by a larger company. Layoffs were inevitable and I anticipated a great severance package. But last week, the new company presented an offer for a job like the one I was doing, except I would report to someone who used to report to me. The company said, ‘ Take it or there is nothing.’

THE FIRST ANSWER

Daniel Lublin Partner, Whitten &Lublin Employment & Labour Lawyers, Toronto

There is no implied right to a severance package, no matter how long or meritorious your service. The entitlement to a package arises only if you are terminated for any reason other than misconduct, including layoffs and restructuring, or if you are constructively dismissed.

Without a termination, one way or another, there is no severance package.

A constructive dismissal is really a termination in disguise. Sometimes an employer makes key changes to your position, compensation, or duties, or it generally mistreats you. If the changes are prejudicial to you and humiliating, you may be entitled to leave work and claim an entitlement to a severance package, even though your employer never said or wrote that you were dismissed.

The key is establishing that the changes to your job were significant and a reasonable person would not be expected to remain in the role.

Changes to your reporting structure could be a constructive dismissal, especially where you are reporting to someone who used to report to you, but I would not count on this fact alone, since the job you are being asked to take on is similar to the one you had.

You need to first figure out what ‘ take it or nothing’ means. Be careful not to indicate that it’s your preference to see a package because this strategy could backfire. I usually tell my clients that if a company knows that you want a package, they can be far less likely to offer you one, in the hope that you will just pack up and leave on your own, without a payment.

Next, get specific advice about whether or not you have a viable constructive-dismissal case, as this may be your only option.

THE SECOND ANSWER

Eileen Dooley Vice- president, VF Career Management, Calgary

When big companies buy big companies, employee reactions vary from, ‘ What is going to happen to my job?’ to ‘ Show me the money!’ The latter is especially true for long- term employees who potentially stand to receive a significant severance amount.

When the new company offers the long- term employee a job, there is relatively limited choice in the matter, especially when it is a similar job with similar responsibilities. If the job is not accepted, usually the only alternative is to take the mandatory amount specified in the Employment Standards Code, which means the employment has ended.

Since a lucrative severance is off the table, consider this a prime opportunity to assess your career, within the new company or elsewhere. Recognize that it is common for the culture of the purchasing company to prevail going forward, forcing you to examine this aspect carefully.

In not accepting the role offered, you’d see a smaller payout but have the time and focus for finding a new role. In contrast, taking the job may preserve your seniority in the event of future layoffs and may present new opportunities you haven’t considered or that weren’t an option with the former company.

Either way, stay in charge of your career by removing the severance money as a primary decision factor and focus instead on what you want out of your work in terms of challenge and opportunity.

https://www.pressreader.com/canada/the-globe-and-mail-alberta-edition/20170529/281981787541714

Jun. 12, 2017 Is the WCB disclosing a cannabis prescription a rights breach?: Today I found this article in the Globe and Mail:

THE QUESTION

I was injured at work and my pain doctor “prescribed” medical cannabis. During that time I was still off work at home with no set return date. There was no need to inform my employer until a return-to-work date was set. My Workers Compensation Board case worker met with my employer and informed them I was “treating” my symptoms with cannabis. My employer decided at that time they could not accommodate me. Does this sound like a huge confidentiality breach?


THE FIRST ANSWER

Lorelle Binnion

Associate, Borden Ladner Gervais, Calgary office

Employers are responsible for ensuring that an employee returning to work after an injury is able to do so safely, which requires the employer to be aware of the employee’s medical limitations. However, it does sound like your privacy rights may have been breached in this situation, since generally your employer is only entitled to know the potential side effects of any medications you are taking, not the names of the medications.

Medical cannabis should be treated no differently than other prescription medications in this sense. Further, your employer should normally provide you with notice or seek your consent before collecting personal information about you.

Equally concerning, however, is your employer’s failure to accommodate your return to work, seemingly based on the fact that you are using medical cannabis to treat your pain.

The law concerning accommodation involving medical cannabis use is still developing in Canada; nonetheless the duty to accommodate does apply. Legally, employers are required to accommodate an employee’s physical disability, such as your workplace injury, to the point of undue hardship.

The “undue hardship” test is difficult to meet and will not be met simply because you are using medical cannabis. Your employer should have determined what your actual limitations are, and then assessed whether those limitations could be accommodated.

At this point, your best course of action is likely to get in touch with an employment lawyer to canvas the possibility of making a complaint to the privacy commissioner, or of bringing a human-rights complaint or a wrongful dismissal action against your former employer.

THE SECOND ANSWER

Kyle Couch

President & CEO, Spectrum Organizational Development Inc., Toronto

Despite any company’s best health and safety efforts, accidents do happen and employees get hurt. It is very unfortunate that you were hurt; however, there are certain limitations to what you can expect from your health-care provider, the Workers Compensation Board (WCB) and your employer.

In most cases, your medical records are a private matter; however, through the Workplace Safety and Insurance Act, the WCB can access your medical records, without your consent, as they relate to your current situation, to ensure your treatment plan follows their guidelines and provide your employer with appropriate updates on your recovery.

While cannabis is currently available to patients in Canada who qualify, it is not currently covered under many WCB coverage programs. Even though your health-care provider issued you a prescription, it likely did not meet your WCB’s treatment guidelines and in turn your employer does not have to accommodate your leave based on this treatment option.
If cannabis is the only pain-management option that works for you, you can certainly continue to utilize it; however, you no longer qualify for covered short– or long-term disability.



Comments:

Nancy G4
8 hours ago

This is what we always seem to see in this feature - a lawyer and and an employment consultant answering the same question, with two opposing takes. This query is a straight LEGAL question, though, and I would say only the lawyer has the correct answer.



Jephary
1 day ago


If Kyle Couch is correct, the injured individual has another question for the panel: Can I act against the MD that offered me medical cannabis without informing me that taking this drug would nullify my disability agreement with WCSB? Especially claiming their expertise in pain management, one would expect familiarity and clarity around disability claims.
Like
2 Reactions



1notice
1 day ago

Does it surprise anybody that WCB is trying to screw the worker in any way it can. I despise them with every bit of my soul
Like
1 Reaction



KEW in Montreal
1 day ago

Did I understand correctly that because this person was prescribed medical cannabis for pain management, they would have NO coverage from the WCB going forward? That is completely crazy! And at the least, the person would have to be informed of this possibility, so as to have the option of refusing the prescription.
Like
1 Reaction